Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO
This article deals with a particular kind of subject complement, and in so doing discusses the notions of “defining feature” and “subjective feature” in utterances where the adverb SO acts as an anaphora for the subject complement. The feature referred to by SO qualifies the subject, thus constituti...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2012-11-01
|
| Series: | Anglophonia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12616 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579239757479936 |
|---|---|
| author | Elisabet Johansson-Manoury |
| author_facet | Elisabet Johansson-Manoury |
| author_sort | Elisabet Johansson-Manoury |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article deals with a particular kind of subject complement, and in so doing discusses the notions of “defining feature” and “subjective feature” in utterances where the adverb SO acts as an anaphora for the subject complement. The feature referred to by SO qualifies the subject, thus constituting a defining feature or a subjective qualification of the subject. The problem under scrutiny is the fact that I have stated elsewhere that the marker SO is linked to the notion of alterity: a feature of subjective origin involves the notion of alterity whereas a defining feature normally does not. In order to make these traits stand out the marker SO is opposed to one and Ø. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6ad08c59816c4be58a0084aa9abc122d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-11-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglophonia |
| spelling | doaj-art-6ad08c59816c4be58a0084aa9abc122d2025-01-30T12:33:26ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662012-11-011612915010.4000/anglophonia.180Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SOElisabet Johansson-ManouryThis article deals with a particular kind of subject complement, and in so doing discusses the notions of “defining feature” and “subjective feature” in utterances where the adverb SO acts as an anaphora for the subject complement. The feature referred to by SO qualifies the subject, thus constituting a defining feature or a subjective qualification of the subject. The problem under scrutiny is the fact that I have stated elsewhere that the marker SO is linked to the notion of alterity: a feature of subjective origin involves the notion of alterity whereas a defining feature normally does not. In order to make these traits stand out the marker SO is opposed to one and Ø.https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12616anaphorasubject complementdefining featuresubjective featurealteritysubjective qualification |
| spellingShingle | Elisabet Johansson-Manoury Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO Anglophonia anaphora subject complement defining feature subjective feature alterity subjective qualification |
| title | Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO |
| title_full | Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO |
| title_fullStr | Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO |
| title_short | Anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet : le cas de SO |
| title_sort | anaphore et fonction attribut du sujet le cas de so |
| topic | anaphora subject complement defining feature subjective feature alterity subjective qualification |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12616 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elisabetjohanssonmanoury anaphoreetfonctionattributdusujetlecasdeso |