Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting

Abstract Aims Sacubitril/Valsartan (Sac/Val) was proven more effective than enalapril for symptomatic patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate eligibility, titration, and tolerability for Sac/Val in a real‐world clinical setting. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlotte Nordberg Backelin, Michael Fu, Charlotta Ljungman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12644
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544407673372672
author Charlotte Nordberg Backelin
Michael Fu
Charlotta Ljungman
author_facet Charlotte Nordberg Backelin
Michael Fu
Charlotta Ljungman
author_sort Charlotte Nordberg Backelin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Sacubitril/Valsartan (Sac/Val) was proven more effective than enalapril for symptomatic patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate eligibility, titration, and tolerability for Sac/Val in a real‐world clinical setting. Methods and results This retrospective cohort study consists of two parts. In Part 1 (eligibility study), all patients discharged from Sahlgrenska University Hospital due to HF were consecutively included during 1 year. Data from the patients' medical records were collected. Patients were adjudicated to be eligible based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria for angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with the exception of N‐terminal (NT)‐proBNP levels. Patients who received <50% of target dose angiotensin‐converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker and otherwise fulfilled ESC criteria were adjudicated to be potentially eligible. In Part 2 (tolerability study), all patients receiving Sac/Val during the same period were included. Medical data regarding dose, titration, and adverse effects and events were registered. A total of 1355 patients (mean age 78 ± 13 years) were hospitalized for HF and 619 patients had an EF ≤40%. Twenty percent were eligible for initiation of ARNI, and additionally 8% were potentially eligible. In all 95 patients (mean age 65 ± 12 years) were initiated with Sac/Val, which correlates to 13%. The patients who were initiated were younger (65 years), more often had dilated cardiomyopathy (31%), more often were on guideline‐directed medical therapy, and had a higher frequency of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator compared with the patients who did not receive Sac/Val. Of the initiated patients, 59% reached target dose of Sac/Val, and 15% discontinued due to adverse effects. The most common cause of discontinuation was benign gastrointestinal adverse effects, followed by elevated creatinine, malaise, and vertigo. Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.58; 95% CI 1.07–2.00; P = 0.038] and NT‐proBNP ≥ median level (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.26–0.90; P = 0.021) was associated with termination of the medication. Conclusions Among HFrEF patients in this real‐world cohort, 20% were eligible for ARNI; however, only 13% received the treatment. Sac/Val was well tolerated, but 41% of the patients did not reach target dose. How this affects outcome is not known and needs further investigation.
format Article
id doaj-art-695947e190f54d238a79dfbd60be5b76
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-5822
language English
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj-art-695947e190f54d238a79dfbd60be5b762025-02-03T10:25:46ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222020-06-01731049105510.1002/ehf2.12644Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical settingCharlotte Nordberg Backelin0Michael Fu1Charlotta Ljungman2Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Göteborg SwedenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Göteborg SwedenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine/Cardiology, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Göteborg SwedenAbstract Aims Sacubitril/Valsartan (Sac/Val) was proven more effective than enalapril for symptomatic patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate eligibility, titration, and tolerability for Sac/Val in a real‐world clinical setting. Methods and results This retrospective cohort study consists of two parts. In Part 1 (eligibility study), all patients discharged from Sahlgrenska University Hospital due to HF were consecutively included during 1 year. Data from the patients' medical records were collected. Patients were adjudicated to be eligible based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria for angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with the exception of N‐terminal (NT)‐proBNP levels. Patients who received <50% of target dose angiotensin‐converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker and otherwise fulfilled ESC criteria were adjudicated to be potentially eligible. In Part 2 (tolerability study), all patients receiving Sac/Val during the same period were included. Medical data regarding dose, titration, and adverse effects and events were registered. A total of 1355 patients (mean age 78 ± 13 years) were hospitalized for HF and 619 patients had an EF ≤40%. Twenty percent were eligible for initiation of ARNI, and additionally 8% were potentially eligible. In all 95 patients (mean age 65 ± 12 years) were initiated with Sac/Val, which correlates to 13%. The patients who were initiated were younger (65 years), more often had dilated cardiomyopathy (31%), more often were on guideline‐directed medical therapy, and had a higher frequency of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator compared with the patients who did not receive Sac/Val. Of the initiated patients, 59% reached target dose of Sac/Val, and 15% discontinued due to adverse effects. The most common cause of discontinuation was benign gastrointestinal adverse effects, followed by elevated creatinine, malaise, and vertigo. Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 3.58; 95% CI 1.07–2.00; P = 0.038] and NT‐proBNP ≥ median level (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.26–0.90; P = 0.021) was associated with termination of the medication. Conclusions Among HFrEF patients in this real‐world cohort, 20% were eligible for ARNI; however, only 13% received the treatment. Sac/Val was well tolerated, but 41% of the patients did not reach target dose. How this affects outcome is not known and needs further investigation.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12644Chronic heart failureEligibilityHFrEFPharmacological TreatmentSacubitril–ValsartanTolerability
spellingShingle Charlotte Nordberg Backelin
Michael Fu
Charlotta Ljungman
Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
ESC Heart Failure
Chronic heart failure
Eligibility
HFrEF
Pharmacological Treatment
Sacubitril–Valsartan
Tolerability
title Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
title_full Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
title_fullStr Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
title_full_unstemmed Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
title_short Early experience of Sacubitril–Valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real‐world clinical setting
title_sort early experience of sacubitril valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in real world clinical setting
topic Chronic heart failure
Eligibility
HFrEF
Pharmacological Treatment
Sacubitril–Valsartan
Tolerability
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12644
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottenordbergbackelin earlyexperienceofsacubitrilvalsartaninheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractioninrealworldclinicalsetting
AT michaelfu earlyexperienceofsacubitrilvalsartaninheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractioninrealworldclinicalsetting
AT charlottaljungman earlyexperienceofsacubitrilvalsartaninheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractioninrealworldclinicalsetting