Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?

Stroke survivors identify a reduced capacity to walk farther distances as a factor limiting their engagement at home and in community. Previous observational studies have shown that measures of balance ability and balance self-efficacy are strong predictors of long-distance walking function after st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louis N. Awad, Darcy S. Reisman, Stuart A. Binder-Macleod
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/646230
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561221268668416
author Louis N. Awad
Darcy S. Reisman
Stuart A. Binder-Macleod
author_facet Louis N. Awad
Darcy S. Reisman
Stuart A. Binder-Macleod
author_sort Louis N. Awad
collection DOAJ
description Stroke survivors identify a reduced capacity to walk farther distances as a factor limiting their engagement at home and in community. Previous observational studies have shown that measures of balance ability and balance self-efficacy are strong predictors of long-distance walking function after stroke. Consequently, recommendations to target balance during rehabilitation have been put forth. The purpose of this study was to determine if the changes in balance and long-distance walking function observed following a 12-week poststroke walking rehabilitation program were related. For thirty-one subjects with hemiparesis after stroke, this investigation explored the cross-sectional (i.e., before training) and longitudinal (i.e., changes due to intervention) relationships between measures of standing balance, walking balance, and balance self-efficacy versus long-distance walking function as measured via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). A regression model containing all three balance variables accounted for 60.8% of the variance in 6MWT performance (R2=.584; F(3,27)=13.931; P<.001); however, only dynamic balance (FGA) was an independent predictor (β=.502) of 6MWT distance. Interestingly, changes in balance were unrelated to changes in the distance walked (each correlation coefficient <.17, P>.05). For persons after stroke similar to those studied, improving balance may not be sufficient to improve long-distance walking function.
format Article
id doaj-art-68f053fe489542298647cfc7680ae13c
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-68f053fe489542298647cfc7680ae13c2025-02-03T01:25:41ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562014-01-01201410.1155/2014/646230646230Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?Louis N. Awad0Darcy S. Reisman1Stuart A. Binder-Macleod2Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, 540 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19713, USAStroke survivors identify a reduced capacity to walk farther distances as a factor limiting their engagement at home and in community. Previous observational studies have shown that measures of balance ability and balance self-efficacy are strong predictors of long-distance walking function after stroke. Consequently, recommendations to target balance during rehabilitation have been put forth. The purpose of this study was to determine if the changes in balance and long-distance walking function observed following a 12-week poststroke walking rehabilitation program were related. For thirty-one subjects with hemiparesis after stroke, this investigation explored the cross-sectional (i.e., before training) and longitudinal (i.e., changes due to intervention) relationships between measures of standing balance, walking balance, and balance self-efficacy versus long-distance walking function as measured via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). A regression model containing all three balance variables accounted for 60.8% of the variance in 6MWT performance (R2=.584; F(3,27)=13.931; P<.001); however, only dynamic balance (FGA) was an independent predictor (β=.502) of 6MWT distance. Interestingly, changes in balance were unrelated to changes in the distance walked (each correlation coefficient <.17, P>.05). For persons after stroke similar to those studied, improving balance may not be sufficient to improve long-distance walking function.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/646230
spellingShingle Louis N. Awad
Darcy S. Reisman
Stuart A. Binder-Macleod
Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
Stroke Research and Treatment
title Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
title_full Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
title_fullStr Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
title_full_unstemmed Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
title_short Do Improvements in Balance Relate to Improvements in Long-Distance Walking Function after Stroke?
title_sort do improvements in balance relate to improvements in long distance walking function after stroke
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/646230
work_keys_str_mv AT louisnawad doimprovementsinbalancerelatetoimprovementsinlongdistancewalkingfunctionafterstroke
AT darcysreisman doimprovementsinbalancerelatetoimprovementsinlongdistancewalkingfunctionafterstroke
AT stuartabindermacleod doimprovementsinbalancerelatetoimprovementsinlongdistancewalkingfunctionafterstroke