Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network

The paper proposes a method for anomaly detection in geomagnetic data based on the classical autoencoder architecture. The training data consisted of daily variations in the geomagnetic field on quiet days for 2020, 2021, and 2022, collected from the Ak-Suu base station of the geomagnetic monitori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Imashev, Sanjar A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук, Южно-Сахалинск, Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт морской геологии и геофизики 2024-12-01
Series:Геосистемы переходных зон
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.imgg.ru/web/full/f2024-4-6.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591956961656832
author Imashev, Sanjar A.
author_facet Imashev, Sanjar A.
author_sort Imashev, Sanjar A.
collection DOAJ
description The paper proposes a method for anomaly detection in geomagnetic data based on the classical autoencoder architecture. The training data consisted of daily variations in the geomagnetic field on quiet days for 2020, 2021, and 2022, collected from the Ak-Suu base station of the geomagnetic monitoring network of the Research Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek. The neural network has five hidden layers with a total of ~3.5‧106 trainable parameters. The trained model accurately reproduces typical features of normal data, whereas in the presence of anomalies it shows a decline in reconstruction quality. This property of the autoencoder was used to classify the data into two categories: normal and anomalous. The reconstruction error, measured as the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), was used as the anomaly metric. In particular, the MAE value of 0.109 was used as the threshold for class separation. Testing the model on the data from the Ak-Suu station for 2017, 2018, and 2019 demonstrated good results. Binary classification metrics such as recall and F1-score were notably high: 0.965 and 0.918 for the 2017 data, 0.982 and 0.933 for the 2018 data, and 0.970 and 0.935 for the 2019 data, respectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-68c1a964db6242ce882723db9feb0d17
institution Kabale University
issn 2541-8912
2713-2161
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук, Южно-Сахалинск, Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт морской геологии и геофизики
record_format Article
series Геосистемы переходных зон
spelling doaj-art-68c1a964db6242ce882723db9feb0d172025-01-22T02:41:08ZengДальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук, Южно-Сахалинск, Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт морской геологии и геофизикиГеосистемы переходных зон2541-89122713-21612024-12-018343356https://doi.org/10.30730/gtrz.2024.8.4.343-356Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural networkImashev, Sanjar A.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3293-3764Research Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek, Bishkek city, KyrgyzstanThe paper proposes a method for anomaly detection in geomagnetic data based on the classical autoencoder architecture. The training data consisted of daily variations in the geomagnetic field on quiet days for 2020, 2021, and 2022, collected from the Ak-Suu base station of the geomagnetic monitoring network of the Research Station of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek. The neural network has five hidden layers with a total of ~3.5‧106 trainable parameters. The trained model accurately reproduces typical features of normal data, whereas in the presence of anomalies it shows a decline in reconstruction quality. This property of the autoencoder was used to classify the data into two categories: normal and anomalous. The reconstruction error, measured as the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), was used as the anomaly metric. In particular, the MAE value of 0.109 was used as the threshold for class separation. Testing the model on the data from the Ak-Suu station for 2017, 2018, and 2019 demonstrated good results. Binary classification metrics such as recall and F1-score were notably high: 0.965 and 0.918 for the 2017 data, 0.982 and 0.933 for the 2018 data, and 0.970 and 0.935 for the 2019 data, respectively.http://journal.imgg.ru/web/full/f2024-4-6.pdfanomalygeomagnetic fieldvariational seriesneural networkautoencoderconfusion matrix
spellingShingle Imashev, Sanjar A.
Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
Геосистемы переходных зон
anomaly
geomagnetic field
variational series
neural network
autoencoder
confusion matrix
title Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
title_full Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
title_fullStr Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
title_full_unstemmed Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
title_short Method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
title_sort method for detecting anomalies in geomagnetic field variations based on artificial neural network
topic anomaly
geomagnetic field
variational series
neural network
autoencoder
confusion matrix
url http://journal.imgg.ru/web/full/f2024-4-6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT imashevsanjara methodfordetectinganomaliesingeomagneticfieldvariationsbasedonartificialneuralnetwork