Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »

This paper compares two approaches of law economics concerning the same empirical object - the United States employees savings schemes – on one hand within the framework of mainstream Law and Economics and on the other within the framework of the Theory of the Regulation. These two approaches diverg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sabine Montagne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2009-06-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577896349171712
author Sabine Montagne
author_facet Sabine Montagne
author_sort Sabine Montagne
collection DOAJ
description This paper compares two approaches of law economics concerning the same empirical object - the United States employees savings schemes – on one hand within the framework of mainstream Law and Economics and on the other within the framework of the Theory of the Regulation. These two approaches diverge as regards the way the take into account of politics, understood as conflicting social relationships. Mainstream approach allows avoiding an explicit treatment of politics at the individual level of the particular case. On the contrary, institutionalist habitus produces a political construction of its object of analysis. This "in situation" comparison shows a better capacity of generalization of institutionalist method because of its very dependence in politics.
format Article
id doaj-art-6821694a2c594a558ad6ef04f785225c
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2009-06-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-6821694a2c594a558ad6ef04f785225c2025-01-30T14:27:16ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962009-06-01510.4000/regulation.7574Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »Sabine MontagneThis paper compares two approaches of law economics concerning the same empirical object - the United States employees savings schemes – on one hand within the framework of mainstream Law and Economics and on the other within the framework of the Theory of the Regulation. These two approaches diverge as regards the way the take into account of politics, understood as conflicting social relationships. Mainstream approach allows avoiding an explicit treatment of politics at the individual level of the particular case. On the contrary, institutionalist habitus produces a political construction of its object of analysis. This "in situation" comparison shows a better capacity of generalization of institutionalist method because of its very dependence in politics.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7574Law and EconomicsInstitutionalismeconomic analysis of lawRegulation Theoryconflictpower
spellingShingle Sabine Montagne
Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
Revue de la Régulation
Law and Economics
Institutionalism
economic analysis of law
Regulation Theory
conflict
power
title Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
title_full Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
title_fullStr Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
title_full_unstemmed Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
title_short Analyse économique du Droit versus Institutionnalisme. Une comparaison « en situation »
title_sort analyse economique du droit versus institutionnalisme une comparaison en situation
topic Law and Economics
Institutionalism
economic analysis of law
Regulation Theory
conflict
power
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7574
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinemontagne analyseeconomiquedudroitversusinstitutionnalismeunecomparaisonensituation