A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures

Abstract Objective The treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures has long posed a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to compare the biomechanical stability and clinical efficacy of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation versus traditiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siyu Duan, Rongda Xu, Hanfei Liu, Ming Sun, Hairui Liang, Zhencun Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08309-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586129804623872
author Siyu Duan
Rongda Xu
Hanfei Liu
Ming Sun
Hairui Liang
Zhencun Cai
author_facet Siyu Duan
Rongda Xu
Hanfei Liu
Ming Sun
Hairui Liang
Zhencun Cai
author_sort Siyu Duan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures has long posed a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to compare the biomechanical stability and clinical efficacy of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation versus traditional partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 14 patients who underwent Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation (Group A) in our department of orthopedics from September 2020 to April 2022. Additionally, we matched 14 patients with similar baseline characteristics who received inferior pole patellectomy combined with patellar tendon repair (Group B). The two groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and at the final follow-up, knee range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Bostman knee function score, peak knee torque, and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio. Results All patients were followed up for more than 12 months. At the final follow-up, Group A showed significantly better outcomes than Group B in terms of knee range of motion (ROM), Bostman knee function score, knee VAS score, and average peak knee torque, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), indicating faster postoperative recovery and better clinical results in Group A. The IS ratio of the injured knee in Group B was 0.71 ± 0.66, less than 0.8, suggesting a decrease in patellar height. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or incision length (P > 0.05). In Group A, one patient experienced complications from hardware irritation, while in Group B, one patient had postoperative knee pain, and two patients experienced knee extension weakness after cast removal and rehabilitation. Conclusion Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation for the treatment of inferior pole patellar fractures yields satisfactory results. This technique provides reliable fixation, restores the original extensor mechanism, promotes early postoperative rehabilitation, and reduces the incidence of complications, making it suitable for clinical application and widespread use. Evidence level Level III (retrospective comparative study)
format Article
id doaj-art-67e2ef00cbfb4f5395a73ae457051c17
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-67e2ef00cbfb4f5395a73ae457051c172025-01-26T12:10:05ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-01-0126111110.1186/s12891-025-08309-4A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fracturesSiyu Duan0Rongda Xu1Hanfei Liu2Ming Sun3Hairui Liang4Zhencun Cai5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical CollegeAbstract Objective The treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures has long posed a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to compare the biomechanical stability and clinical efficacy of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation versus traditional partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 14 patients who underwent Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation (Group A) in our department of orthopedics from September 2020 to April 2022. Additionally, we matched 14 patients with similar baseline characteristics who received inferior pole patellectomy combined with patellar tendon repair (Group B). The two groups were compared in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and at the final follow-up, knee range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Bostman knee function score, peak knee torque, and Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio. Results All patients were followed up for more than 12 months. At the final follow-up, Group A showed significantly better outcomes than Group B in terms of knee range of motion (ROM), Bostman knee function score, knee VAS score, and average peak knee torque, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05), indicating faster postoperative recovery and better clinical results in Group A. The IS ratio of the injured knee in Group B was 0.71 ± 0.66, less than 0.8, suggesting a decrease in patellar height. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or incision length (P > 0.05). In Group A, one patient experienced complications from hardware irritation, while in Group B, one patient had postoperative knee pain, and two patients experienced knee extension weakness after cast removal and rehabilitation. Conclusion Kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture fixation for the treatment of inferior pole patellar fractures yields satisfactory results. This technique provides reliable fixation, restores the original extensor mechanism, promotes early postoperative rehabilitation, and reduces the incidence of complications, making it suitable for clinical application and widespread use. Evidence level Level III (retrospective comparative study)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08309-4Inferior pole patellar fractureTension bandSuture anchorInternal fixationPartial patellectomy
spellingShingle Siyu Duan
Rongda Xu
Hanfei Liu
Ming Sun
Hairui Liang
Zhencun Cai
A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Inferior pole patellar fracture
Tension band
Suture anchor
Internal fixation
Partial patellectomy
title A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
title_full A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
title_fullStr A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
title_short A comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross-suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
title_sort comparative study on the efficacy of kirschner wire tension band combined with anchor cross suture internal fixation versus partial patellectomy in the treatment of comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures
topic Inferior pole patellar fracture
Tension band
Suture anchor
Internal fixation
Partial patellectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08309-4
work_keys_str_mv AT siyuduan acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT rongdaxu acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT hanfeiliu acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT mingsun acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT hairuiliang acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT zhencuncai acomparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT siyuduan comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT rongdaxu comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT hanfeiliu comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT mingsun comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT hairuiliang comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures
AT zhencuncai comparativestudyontheefficacyofkirschnerwiretensionbandcombinedwithanchorcrosssutureinternalfixationversuspartialpatellectomyinthetreatmentofcomminutedinferiorpolepatellarfractures