Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.

<h4>Background</h4>Remission has been identified as a top priority by people with type 2 diabetes. Remission is commonly used as an outcome in research studies; however, a widely accepted definition of remission of type 2 diabetes is lacking. A report on defining remission was published...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mireille Captieux, Regina Prigge, Sarah Wild, Bruce Guthrie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-10-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003396&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540324653694976
author Mireille Captieux
Regina Prigge
Sarah Wild
Bruce Guthrie
author_facet Mireille Captieux
Regina Prigge
Sarah Wild
Bruce Guthrie
author_sort Mireille Captieux
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Remission has been identified as a top priority by people with type 2 diabetes. Remission is commonly used as an outcome in research studies; however, a widely accepted definition of remission of type 2 diabetes is lacking. A report on defining remission was published (but not formally endorsed) in Diabetes Care, an American Diabetes Association (ADA) journal. This Diabetes Care report remains widely used. It was the first to suggest 3 components necessary to define the presence of remission: (1) absence of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT); (2) normoglycaemia; and (3) for duration ≥1 year. Our aim is to systematically review how remission of type 2 diabetes has been defined by observational and interventional studies since publication of the 2009 report.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) were searched for studies published from 1 September 2009 to 18 July 2020 involving at least 100 participants with type 2 diabetes in their remission analysis, which examined an outcome of type 2 diabetes remission in adults ≥18 years and which had been published in English since 2009. Remission definitions were extracted and categorised by glucose-lowering therapy, glycaemic thresholds, and duration. A total of 8,966 titles/abstracts were screened, and 178 studies (165 observational and 13 interventional) from 33 countries were included. These contributed 266 definitions, of which 96 were unique. The 2009 report was referenced in 121 (45%) definitions. In total, 247 (93%) definitions required the absence of GLT, and 232 (87%) definitions specified numeric glycaemic thresholds. The most frequently used threshold was HbA1c<42 mmol/mol (6.0%) in 47 (20%) definitions. Time was frequently omitted. In this study, a total of 104 (39%) definitions defined time as a duration. The main limitations of this systematic review lie in the restriction to published studies written in English with sample sizes of over 100. Grey literature was not included in the search.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We found that there is substantial heterogeneity in the definition of type 2 diabetes remission in research studies published since 2009, at least partly reflecting ambiguity in the 2009 report. This complicates interpretation of previous research on remission of type 2 diabetes and the implications for people with type 2 diabetes. Any new consensus definition of remission should include unambiguous glycaemic thresholds and emphasise duration. Until an international consensus is reached, studies describing remission should clearly define all 3 components of remission.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42019144619.
format Article
id doaj-art-66c8021133be4583bd512df9ad97c7d8
institution Kabale University
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-66c8021133be4583bd512df9ad97c7d82025-02-05T05:30:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762020-10-011710e100339610.1371/journal.pmed.1003396Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.Mireille CaptieuxRegina PriggeSarah WildBruce Guthrie<h4>Background</h4>Remission has been identified as a top priority by people with type 2 diabetes. Remission is commonly used as an outcome in research studies; however, a widely accepted definition of remission of type 2 diabetes is lacking. A report on defining remission was published (but not formally endorsed) in Diabetes Care, an American Diabetes Association (ADA) journal. This Diabetes Care report remains widely used. It was the first to suggest 3 components necessary to define the presence of remission: (1) absence of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT); (2) normoglycaemia; and (3) for duration ≥1 year. Our aim is to systematically review how remission of type 2 diabetes has been defined by observational and interventional studies since publication of the 2009 report.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) were searched for studies published from 1 September 2009 to 18 July 2020 involving at least 100 participants with type 2 diabetes in their remission analysis, which examined an outcome of type 2 diabetes remission in adults ≥18 years and which had been published in English since 2009. Remission definitions were extracted and categorised by glucose-lowering therapy, glycaemic thresholds, and duration. A total of 8,966 titles/abstracts were screened, and 178 studies (165 observational and 13 interventional) from 33 countries were included. These contributed 266 definitions, of which 96 were unique. The 2009 report was referenced in 121 (45%) definitions. In total, 247 (93%) definitions required the absence of GLT, and 232 (87%) definitions specified numeric glycaemic thresholds. The most frequently used threshold was HbA1c<42 mmol/mol (6.0%) in 47 (20%) definitions. Time was frequently omitted. In this study, a total of 104 (39%) definitions defined time as a duration. The main limitations of this systematic review lie in the restriction to published studies written in English with sample sizes of over 100. Grey literature was not included in the search.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We found that there is substantial heterogeneity in the definition of type 2 diabetes remission in research studies published since 2009, at least partly reflecting ambiguity in the 2009 report. This complicates interpretation of previous research on remission of type 2 diabetes and the implications for people with type 2 diabetes. Any new consensus definition of remission should include unambiguous glycaemic thresholds and emphasise duration. Until an international consensus is reached, studies describing remission should clearly define all 3 components of remission.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>PROSPERO CRD42019144619.https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003396&type=printable
spellingShingle Mireille Captieux
Regina Prigge
Sarah Wild
Bruce Guthrie
Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
PLoS Medicine
title Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
title_full Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
title_fullStr Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
title_short Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review.
title_sort defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies a systematic scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003396&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT mireillecaptieux definingremissionoftype2diabetesinresearchstudiesasystematicscopingreview
AT reginaprigge definingremissionoftype2diabetesinresearchstudiesasystematicscopingreview
AT sarahwild definingremissionoftype2diabetesinresearchstudiesasystematicscopingreview
AT bruceguthrie definingremissionoftype2diabetesinresearchstudiesasystematicscopingreview