Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study
BackgroundPatients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians’ computerized notes in their medical records (“open notes”). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important wa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Medical Education |
| Online Access: | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e59301 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593473027440640 |
|---|---|
| author | Anita Vanka Katherine T Johnston Tom Delbanco Catherine M DesRoches Annalays Garcia Liz Salmi Charlotte Blease |
| author_facet | Anita Vanka Katherine T Johnston Tom Delbanco Catherine M DesRoches Annalays Garcia Liz Salmi Charlotte Blease |
| author_sort | Anita Vanka |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundPatients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians’ computerized notes in their medical records (“open notes”). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms.
ObjectiveAt a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records.
MethodsThrough a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings.
ResultsThe participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients’ needs.
ConclusionsThe process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-65f6c0542e2e4673b27e0765eb603948 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2369-3762 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-65f6c0542e2e4673b27e0765eb6039482025-01-20T15:00:47ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Medical Education2369-37622025-01-0111e5930110.2196/59301Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative StudyAnita Vankahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6536-6925Katherine T Johnstonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-2419Tom Delbancohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-9333Catherine M DesRocheshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-855XAnnalays Garciahttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-2319-8259Liz Salmihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-7438Charlotte Bleasehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-1165 BackgroundPatients in the United States have recently gained federally mandated, free, and ready electronic access to clinicians’ computerized notes in their medical records (“open notes”). This change from longstanding practice can benefit patients in clinically important ways, but studies show some patients feel judged or stigmatized by words or phrases embedded in their records. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians adopt documentation techniques that help both to empower patients and minimize potential harms. ObjectiveAt a time when open and transparent communication among patients, families, and clinicians can spread more easily throughout medical practice, this inquiry aims to develop informed guidelines for documentation in medical records. MethodsThrough a series of focus groups, preliminary guidelines for documentation language in medical records were developed by health professionals and patients. Using a structured focus group decision guide, we conducted 4 group meetings with different sets of 27 participants: physicians experienced with writing open notes (n=5), patients accustomed to reviewing their notes (n=8), medical student educators (n=7), and resident physicians (n=7). To generate themes, we used an iterative coding process. First-order codes were grouped into second-order themes based on the commonality of meanings. ResultsThe participants identified 10 important guidelines as a preliminary framework for developing notes sensitive to patients’ needs. ConclusionsThe process identified 10 discrete themes that can help clinicians use and spread patient-centered documentation.https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e59301 |
| spellingShingle | Anita Vanka Katherine T Johnston Tom Delbanco Catherine M DesRoches Annalays Garcia Liz Salmi Charlotte Blease Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study JMIR Medical Education |
| title | Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study |
| title_full | Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study |
| title_fullStr | Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study |
| title_short | Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study |
| title_sort | guidelines for patient centered documentation in the era of open notes qualitative study |
| url | https://mededu.jmir.org/2025/1/e59301 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anitavanka guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT katherinetjohnston guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT tomdelbanco guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT catherinemdesroches guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT annalaysgarcia guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT lizsalmi guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy AT charlotteblease guidelinesforpatientcentereddocumentationintheeraofopennotesqualitativestudy |