Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin

We apply machine learning techniques to identify and map resurfacing units in the central South Pole−Aitken (SPA) basin using three Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission data sets: 321/415 nm and 566/689 nm band reflectance ratios from Hapke photometrically standardized albedo maps and a Terrai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank C. Chuang, Matthew D. Richardson, Jennifer L. Whitten, Daniel P. Moriarty, Deborah L. Domingue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Planetary Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada4a6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540955124695040
author Frank C. Chuang
Matthew D. Richardson
Jennifer L. Whitten
Daniel P. Moriarty
Deborah L. Domingue
author_facet Frank C. Chuang
Matthew D. Richardson
Jennifer L. Whitten
Daniel P. Moriarty
Deborah L. Domingue
author_sort Frank C. Chuang
collection DOAJ
description We apply machine learning techniques to identify and map resurfacing units in the central South Pole−Aitken (SPA) basin using three Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission data sets: 321/415 nm and 566/689 nm band reflectance ratios from Hapke photometrically standardized albedo maps and a Terrain Ruggedness Index map using the Wilson et al. method. Other data were considered, but albedo and topography data were key in distinguishing between maria, cryptomaria, and light plains. A two-step image classification approach was applied to the data sets, an unsupervised K-Means algorithm followed by a supervised Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithm. K-Means identified four units, one associated with dark smooth maria, two not associated with any particular features, and a fourth associated with edge effects. To further discriminate between the two nonassociated units, the K-Means unit map and an LRO morphologic basemap were used to select multiple training areas for three defined units in the MLC algorithm: mare, cryptomare, and cryptomare/light plains. From the training area values, the MLC unit map showed a distinction between the two prior indistinguishable K-Means units. Our results show (1) that the cryptomare from the MLC algorithm is in good agreement with cryptomaria mapped by J. L. Whitten & J. W. Head, (2) that the presence of scattered maria within large patches of cryptomaria indicates possible incomplete and/or uneven ejecta deposits or sheet flows covering cryptomare surfaces, and (3) a 79% increase in the total extent of cryptomaria compared to that by J. L. Whitten & J. W. Head for the same given study area in central SPA.
format Article
id doaj-art-659a6402acbc40a49687541212525be9
institution Kabale University
issn 2632-3338
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Planetary Science Journal
spelling doaj-art-659a6402acbc40a49687541212525be92025-02-04T10:48:33ZengIOP PublishingThe Planetary Science Journal2632-33382025-01-01623510.3847/PSJ/ada4a6Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken BasinFrank C. Chuang0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-7930Matthew D. Richardson1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-5082Jennifer L. Whitten2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-9597Daniel P. Moriarty3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-2337Deborah L. Domingue4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-4634Planetary Science Institute , Tucson, AZ 85719, USAPlanetary Science Institute , Tucson, AZ 85719, USACenter for Earth and Planetary Studies/National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution , Washington, DC 20560, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; University of Maryland , College Park, MD 20742, USA; Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science & Technology II, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and University of Maryland , USAPlanetary Science Institute , Tucson, AZ 85719, USAWe apply machine learning techniques to identify and map resurfacing units in the central South Pole−Aitken (SPA) basin using three Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) mission data sets: 321/415 nm and 566/689 nm band reflectance ratios from Hapke photometrically standardized albedo maps and a Terrain Ruggedness Index map using the Wilson et al. method. Other data were considered, but albedo and topography data were key in distinguishing between maria, cryptomaria, and light plains. A two-step image classification approach was applied to the data sets, an unsupervised K-Means algorithm followed by a supervised Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithm. K-Means identified four units, one associated with dark smooth maria, two not associated with any particular features, and a fourth associated with edge effects. To further discriminate between the two nonassociated units, the K-Means unit map and an LRO morphologic basemap were used to select multiple training areas for three defined units in the MLC algorithm: mare, cryptomare, and cryptomare/light plains. From the training area values, the MLC unit map showed a distinction between the two prior indistinguishable K-Means units. Our results show (1) that the cryptomare from the MLC algorithm is in good agreement with cryptomaria mapped by J. L. Whitten & J. W. Head, (2) that the presence of scattered maria within large patches of cryptomaria indicates possible incomplete and/or uneven ejecta deposits or sheet flows covering cryptomare surfaces, and (3) a 79% increase in the total extent of cryptomaria compared to that by J. L. Whitten & J. W. Head for the same given study area in central SPA.https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada4a6Lunar mariaLunar featuresLunar scienceThe Moon
spellingShingle Frank C. Chuang
Matthew D. Richardson
Jennifer L. Whitten
Daniel P. Moriarty
Deborah L. Domingue
Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
The Planetary Science Journal
Lunar maria
Lunar features
Lunar science
The Moon
title Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
title_full Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
title_fullStr Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
title_full_unstemmed Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
title_short Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Distinguish between Mare, Cryptomare, and Light Plains in Central Lunar South Pole−Aitken Basin
title_sort application of machine learning techniques to distinguish between mare cryptomare and light plains in central lunar south pole aitken basin
topic Lunar maria
Lunar features
Lunar science
The Moon
url https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ada4a6
work_keys_str_mv AT frankcchuang applicationofmachinelearningtechniquestodistinguishbetweenmarecryptomareandlightplainsincentrallunarsouthpoleaitkenbasin
AT matthewdrichardson applicationofmachinelearningtechniquestodistinguishbetweenmarecryptomareandlightplainsincentrallunarsouthpoleaitkenbasin
AT jenniferlwhitten applicationofmachinelearningtechniquestodistinguishbetweenmarecryptomareandlightplainsincentrallunarsouthpoleaitkenbasin
AT danielpmoriarty applicationofmachinelearningtechniquestodistinguishbetweenmarecryptomareandlightplainsincentrallunarsouthpoleaitkenbasin
AT deborahldomingue applicationofmachinelearningtechniquestodistinguishbetweenmarecryptomareandlightplainsincentrallunarsouthpoleaitkenbasin