Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective
The notion of impurity is identified in numerous belief systems, ranging from certain religions to nationalisms. Understanding its nature and functioning beyond its concrete objects is therefore a fundamental anthropological question. This work is grounded in anthropology, though it may be of intere...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Religions |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/80 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832587573478817792 |
|---|---|
| author | Alice Van den Bogaert |
| author_facet | Alice Van den Bogaert |
| author_sort | Alice Van den Bogaert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The notion of impurity is identified in numerous belief systems, ranging from certain religions to nationalisms. Understanding its nature and functioning beyond its concrete objects is therefore a fundamental anthropological question. This work is grounded in anthropology, though it may be of interest to scholars from other disciplines. Impurity has been highlighted by numerous authors in ethnographic and theoretical texts, but a comparison of these various works indicates a lack of theoretical development. We will therefore begin by presenting the various explanations attributed to it, before proposing that the notion of impurity is primarily a knowledge of natural laws causing illness, death, and misfortune, based on the observation of contagion and implying an ontology of moral substantiality. I propose this concept to designate an ontology in which everything is a substance (bodily fluids and food, but also glances, words, and thoughts) and at the same time a moral value, without distinguishing between materiality and symbolism, a proposal inspired by McKim Marriott’s substance-codes (1976). This knowledge has then become a tool of social control, aiming to protect reproduction (social, cosmic, and ontological), through its effective language combining a somatopsychological aspect (disgust reaction) and social rejection. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-655be6079bd54a958961c671d0cb0910 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2077-1444 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Religions |
| spelling | doaj-art-655be6079bd54a958961c671d0cb09102025-01-24T13:47:33ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442025-01-011618010.3390/rel16010080Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender PerspectiveAlice Van den Bogaert0Departament d’Antropologia Social i Cultural, Facultat de Geografia i Història, Universitat de Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, SpainThe notion of impurity is identified in numerous belief systems, ranging from certain religions to nationalisms. Understanding its nature and functioning beyond its concrete objects is therefore a fundamental anthropological question. This work is grounded in anthropology, though it may be of interest to scholars from other disciplines. Impurity has been highlighted by numerous authors in ethnographic and theoretical texts, but a comparison of these various works indicates a lack of theoretical development. We will therefore begin by presenting the various explanations attributed to it, before proposing that the notion of impurity is primarily a knowledge of natural laws causing illness, death, and misfortune, based on the observation of contagion and implying an ontology of moral substantiality. I propose this concept to designate an ontology in which everything is a substance (bodily fluids and food, but also glances, words, and thoughts) and at the same time a moral value, without distinguishing between materiality and symbolism, a proposal inspired by McKim Marriott’s substance-codes (1976). This knowledge has then become a tool of social control, aiming to protect reproduction (social, cosmic, and ontological), through its effective language combining a somatopsychological aspect (disgust reaction) and social rejection.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/80impuritycontagionmoral substantialitydisgustreproductiongender |
| spellingShingle | Alice Van den Bogaert Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective Religions impurity contagion moral substantiality disgust reproduction gender |
| title | Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective |
| title_full | Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective |
| title_fullStr | Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective |
| title_short | Impurity, Moral Substantiality, and Social Control: A Gender Perspective |
| title_sort | impurity moral substantiality and social control a gender perspective |
| topic | impurity contagion moral substantiality disgust reproduction gender |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/80 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alicevandenbogaert impuritymoralsubstantialityandsocialcontrolagenderperspective |