Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information

Background. Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. Methods. COPD inhalers were identified from the Health C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn Fullmann, David F. Blackburn, Mark E. Fenton, Holly Mansell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Canadian Respiratory Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562874331955200
author Kathryn Fullmann
David F. Blackburn
Mark E. Fenton
Holly Mansell
author_facet Kathryn Fullmann
David F. Blackburn
Mark E. Fenton
Holly Mansell
author_sort Kathryn Fullmann
collection DOAJ
description Background. Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. Methods. COPD inhalers were identified from the Health Canada Drug Product Database. Medication information and instructions for inhaler use were analyzed for readability by seven formulas, with an acceptability threshold of grades 6–8. Three researchers rated suitability using a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) tool and assessed leaflets for explicit warnings. Results. Twenty-six inhalers with a COPD indication were evaluated. Medication information sections were rated as “difficult to read” or “hard,” and 85% (22/26) had a reading level above grade 8. The instructions for inhaler use were rated as “easy” or “fairly easy” to read and 63% (16/26) met the threshold by all formulas. While all leaflets achieved superior suitability ratings, extreme warnings included risk of premature death (n=12), risks of serious injury (n=26), serious interactions (n=26), and statements that convey a serious consequence to therapy (n=26). Conclusion. While COPD information leaflets in Canada performed well in terms of readability and suitability, overemphasis on side effects, warnings, and precautions may contribute to patient fear and nonadherence.
format Article
id doaj-art-64f094c0ecbb467a9ee53e828294e026
institution Kabale University
issn 1198-2241
1916-7245
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj-art-64f094c0ecbb467a9ee53e828294e0262025-02-03T01:21:29ZengWileyCanadian Respiratory Journal1198-22411916-72452017-01-01201710.1155/2017/29452822945282Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer InformationKathryn Fullmann0David F. Blackburn1Mark E. Fenton2Holly Mansell3College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaDivision of Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, CanadaBackground. Information leaflets have been shown to positively or negatively impact adherence, depending on their content. The objective of this study was to perform an appraisal of the consumer information provided in COPD inhaler monographs. Methods. COPD inhalers were identified from the Health Canada Drug Product Database. Medication information and instructions for inhaler use were analyzed for readability by seven formulas, with an acceptability threshold of grades 6–8. Three researchers rated suitability using a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) tool and assessed leaflets for explicit warnings. Results. Twenty-six inhalers with a COPD indication were evaluated. Medication information sections were rated as “difficult to read” or “hard,” and 85% (22/26) had a reading level above grade 8. The instructions for inhaler use were rated as “easy” or “fairly easy” to read and 63% (16/26) met the threshold by all formulas. While all leaflets achieved superior suitability ratings, extreme warnings included risk of premature death (n=12), risks of serious injury (n=26), serious interactions (n=26), and statements that convey a serious consequence to therapy (n=26). Conclusion. While COPD information leaflets in Canada performed well in terms of readability and suitability, overemphasis on side effects, warnings, and precautions may contribute to patient fear and nonadherence.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282
spellingShingle Kathryn Fullmann
David F. Blackburn
Mark E. Fenton
Holly Mansell
Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
Canadian Respiratory Journal
title Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_full Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_fullStr Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_full_unstemmed Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_short Readability and Suitability of COPD Consumer Information
title_sort readability and suitability of copd consumer information
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2945282
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynfullmann readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT davidfblackburn readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT markefenton readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation
AT hollymansell readabilityandsuitabilityofcopdconsumerinformation