APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology

Abstract Background Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). A recent case report identified a rare variant in APOE, APOE3-R136S (Christchurch), proposed to confer resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). However, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristine M. Tran, Nellie E. Kwang, Claire A. Butler, Angela Gomez-Arboledas, Shimako Kawauchi, Cassandra Mar, Donna Chao, Rocio A. Barahona, Celia Da Cunha, Kate I. Tsourmas, Zechuan Shi, Shuling Wang, Sherilyn Collins, Amber Walker, Kai-Xuan Shi, Joshua A. Alcantara, Jonathan Neumann, Duc M. Duong, Nicholas T. Seyfried, Andrea J. Tenner, Frank M. LaFerla, Lindsay A. Hohsfield, Vivek Swarup, Grant R. MacGregor, Kim N. Green
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Molecular Neurodegeneration
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-024-00793-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585356541689856
author Kristine M. Tran
Nellie E. Kwang
Claire A. Butler
Angela Gomez-Arboledas
Shimako Kawauchi
Cassandra Mar
Donna Chao
Rocio A. Barahona
Celia Da Cunha
Kate I. Tsourmas
Zechuan Shi
Shuling Wang
Sherilyn Collins
Amber Walker
Kai-Xuan Shi
Joshua A. Alcantara
Jonathan Neumann
Duc M. Duong
Nicholas T. Seyfried
Andrea J. Tenner
Frank M. LaFerla
Lindsay A. Hohsfield
Vivek Swarup
Grant R. MacGregor
Kim N. Green
author_facet Kristine M. Tran
Nellie E. Kwang
Claire A. Butler
Angela Gomez-Arboledas
Shimako Kawauchi
Cassandra Mar
Donna Chao
Rocio A. Barahona
Celia Da Cunha
Kate I. Tsourmas
Zechuan Shi
Shuling Wang
Sherilyn Collins
Amber Walker
Kai-Xuan Shi
Joshua A. Alcantara
Jonathan Neumann
Duc M. Duong
Nicholas T. Seyfried
Andrea J. Tenner
Frank M. LaFerla
Lindsay A. Hohsfield
Vivek Swarup
Grant R. MacGregor
Kim N. Green
author_sort Kristine M. Tran
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). A recent case report identified a rare variant in APOE, APOE3-R136S (Christchurch), proposed to confer resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). However, it remains unclear whether and how this variant exerts its protective effects. Methods We introduced the R136S variant into mouse Apoe (ApoeCh) and investigated its effect on the development of AD-related pathology using the 5xFAD model of amyloidosis and the PS19 model of tauopathy. We used immunohistochemical and biochemical analysis along with single-cell spatial omics and bulk proteomics to explore the impact of the ApoeCh variant on AD pathological development and the brain’s response to plaques and tau. Results In 5xFAD mice, ApoeCh enhances a Disease-Associated Microglia (DAM) phenotype in microglia surrounding plaques, and reduces plaque load, dystrophic neurites, and plasma neurofilament light chain. By contrast, in PS19 mice, ApoeCh suppresses the microglial and astrocytic responses to tau-laden neurons and does not reduce tau accumulation or phosphorylation, but partially rescues tau-induced synaptic and myelin loss. We compared how microglia responses differ between the two mouse models to elucidate the distinct DAM signatures induced by ApoeCh. We identified upregulation of antigen presentation-related genes in the DAM response in a PS19 compared to a 5xFAD background, suggesting a differential response to amyloid versus tau pathology that is modulated by the presence of ApoeCh. Bulk proteomics show upregulated mitochondrial protein abundance with ApoeCh in 5xFAD mice, but reductions in mitochondrial and translation associated proteins in PS19 mice. Conclusions These findings highlight the ability of the ApoeCh variant to modulate microglial responses based on the type of pathology, enhancing DAM reactivity in amyloid models and dampening neuroinflammation to promote protection in tau models. This suggests that the Christchurch variant's protective effects likely involve multiple mechanisms, including changes in receptor binding and microglial programming. Graphical Abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-64c1d0d86c08473db659bf70e4f03c40
institution Kabale University
issn 1750-1326
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Molecular Neurodegeneration
spelling doaj-art-64c1d0d86c08473db659bf70e4f03c402025-01-26T12:52:29ZengBMCMolecular Neurodegeneration1750-13262025-01-0120114010.1186/s13024-024-00793-xAPOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathologyKristine M. Tran0Nellie E. Kwang1Claire A. Butler2Angela Gomez-Arboledas3Shimako Kawauchi4Cassandra Mar5Donna Chao6Rocio A. Barahona7Celia Da Cunha8Kate I. Tsourmas9Zechuan Shi10Shuling Wang11Sherilyn Collins12Amber Walker13Kai-Xuan Shi14Joshua A. Alcantara15Jonathan Neumann16Duc M. Duong17Nicholas T. Seyfried18Andrea J. Tenner19Frank M. LaFerla20Lindsay A. Hohsfield21Vivek Swarup22Grant R. MacGregor23Kim N. Green24Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of CaliforniaInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaARCProteomicsGoizueta Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Emory University School of MedicineDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaTransgenic Mouse Facility, ULAR, Office of Research, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Charlie Dunlop School of Biological Sciences, University of CaliforniaAbstract Background Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD). A recent case report identified a rare variant in APOE, APOE3-R136S (Christchurch), proposed to confer resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). However, it remains unclear whether and how this variant exerts its protective effects. Methods We introduced the R136S variant into mouse Apoe (ApoeCh) and investigated its effect on the development of AD-related pathology using the 5xFAD model of amyloidosis and the PS19 model of tauopathy. We used immunohistochemical and biochemical analysis along with single-cell spatial omics and bulk proteomics to explore the impact of the ApoeCh variant on AD pathological development and the brain’s response to plaques and tau. Results In 5xFAD mice, ApoeCh enhances a Disease-Associated Microglia (DAM) phenotype in microglia surrounding plaques, and reduces plaque load, dystrophic neurites, and plasma neurofilament light chain. By contrast, in PS19 mice, ApoeCh suppresses the microglial and astrocytic responses to tau-laden neurons and does not reduce tau accumulation or phosphorylation, but partially rescues tau-induced synaptic and myelin loss. We compared how microglia responses differ between the two mouse models to elucidate the distinct DAM signatures induced by ApoeCh. We identified upregulation of antigen presentation-related genes in the DAM response in a PS19 compared to a 5xFAD background, suggesting a differential response to amyloid versus tau pathology that is modulated by the presence of ApoeCh. Bulk proteomics show upregulated mitochondrial protein abundance with ApoeCh in 5xFAD mice, but reductions in mitochondrial and translation associated proteins in PS19 mice. Conclusions These findings highlight the ability of the ApoeCh variant to modulate microglial responses based on the type of pathology, enhancing DAM reactivity in amyloid models and dampening neuroinflammation to promote protection in tau models. This suggests that the Christchurch variant's protective effects likely involve multiple mechanisms, including changes in receptor binding and microglial programming. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-024-00793-xAPOE ChristchurchPS195xFADMicrogliaDAMAmyloid
spellingShingle Kristine M. Tran
Nellie E. Kwang
Claire A. Butler
Angela Gomez-Arboledas
Shimako Kawauchi
Cassandra Mar
Donna Chao
Rocio A. Barahona
Celia Da Cunha
Kate I. Tsourmas
Zechuan Shi
Shuling Wang
Sherilyn Collins
Amber Walker
Kai-Xuan Shi
Joshua A. Alcantara
Jonathan Neumann
Duc M. Duong
Nicholas T. Seyfried
Andrea J. Tenner
Frank M. LaFerla
Lindsay A. Hohsfield
Vivek Swarup
Grant R. MacGregor
Kim N. Green
APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
Molecular Neurodegeneration
APOE Christchurch
PS19
5xFAD
Microglia
DAM
Amyloid
title APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
title_full APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
title_fullStr APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
title_full_unstemmed APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
title_short APOE Christchurch enhances a disease-associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
title_sort apoe christchurch enhances a disease associated microglial response to plaque but suppresses response to tau pathology
topic APOE Christchurch
PS19
5xFAD
Microglia
DAM
Amyloid
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-024-00793-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kristinemtran apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT nellieekwang apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT claireabutler apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT angelagomezarboledas apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT shimakokawauchi apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT cassandramar apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT donnachao apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT rocioabarahona apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT celiadacunha apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT kateitsourmas apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT zechuanshi apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT shulingwang apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT sherilyncollins apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT amberwalker apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT kaixuanshi apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT joshuaaalcantara apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT jonathanneumann apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT ducmduong apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT nicholastseyfried apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT andreajtenner apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT frankmlaferla apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT lindsayahohsfield apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT vivekswarup apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT grantrmacgregor apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology
AT kimngreen apoechristchurchenhancesadiseaseassociatedmicroglialresponsetoplaquebutsuppressesresponsetotaupathology