Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible »
According to majors codes of ethic, the aim of restoration is to « facilitate the reading » or « the understanding » of the objects. The notion of legibility applied to paintings is questioned (and opposed to the notion of perception). The idea that a work of art is created to deliver a “message” is...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Association CeROArt
2009-04-01
|
| Series: | CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1140 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832578105731973120 |
|---|---|
| author | Michel Favre-Félix |
| author_facet | Michel Favre-Félix |
| author_sort | Michel Favre-Félix |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | According to majors codes of ethic, the aim of restoration is to « facilitate the reading » or « the understanding » of the objects. The notion of legibility applied to paintings is questioned (and opposed to the notion of perception). The idea that a work of art is created to deliver a “message” is criticized. These ambiguous terms appear to have misleading and falsifying effects on the restoration process and results. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6487a91472c94212b1adf1fb8af3260b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1784-5092 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2009-04-01 |
| publisher | Association CeROArt |
| record_format | Article |
| series | CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art |
| spelling | doaj-art-6487a91472c94212b1adf1fb8af3260b2025-01-30T14:13:33ZengAssociation CeROArtCeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art1784-50922009-04-01310.4000/ceroart.1140Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible »Michel Favre-FélixAccording to majors codes of ethic, the aim of restoration is to « facilitate the reading » or « the understanding » of the objects. The notion of legibility applied to paintings is questioned (and opposed to the notion of perception). The idea that a work of art is created to deliver a “message” is criticized. These ambiguous terms appear to have misleading and falsifying effects on the restoration process and results.https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1140restorationreadabilitylegibilityethicsperceptionmessage |
| spellingShingle | Michel Favre-Félix Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » CeROArt : Conservation, Exposition, Restauration d'Objets d'Art restoration readability legibility ethics perception message |
| title | Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » |
| title_full | Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » |
| title_fullStr | Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » |
| title_short | Ambiguïtés, erreurs et conséquences : « Rendre l’œuvre lisible » |
| title_sort | ambiguites erreurs et consequences rendre l oeuvre lisible |
| topic | restoration readability legibility ethics perception message |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1140 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michelfavrefelix ambiguiteserreursetconsequencesrendrelœuvrelisible |