Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London
Objectives. To review the determinants for a failed operative vaginal delivery and to examine associated fetal and maternal morbidity. Design. Retrospective observational study. Setting. Large London Teaching Hospital. Method. A retrospective review of case notes during a 5-year period was carried o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pregnancy |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/627810 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832557023412092928 |
|---|---|
| author | Sian McDonnell Edwin Chandraharan |
| author_facet | Sian McDonnell Edwin Chandraharan |
| author_sort | Sian McDonnell |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives. To review the determinants for a failed operative vaginal delivery and to examine associated fetal and maternal morbidity. Design. Retrospective observational study. Setting. Large London Teaching Hospital. Method. A retrospective review of case notes during a 5-year period was carried out. Results. Overall 119 women (0.44%) out of 26,856 births had a caesarean section following a failed instrumental delivery, which comprised 5.1% of all operative vaginal births. 73% had a spontaneous onset of labour and 63% required syntocinon at some time prior to delivery. 71.5% of deliveries were complicated by malposition. Only 20% of deliveries were attended by a consultant obstetrician. Almost 50% of women and 8.4% of neonates sustained trauma at the time of either their failed instrumental delivery or the caesarean section. Conclusions. Emergency caesarean section during the second stage of labour is associated with maternal and fetal complications. A ‘failed instrumental delivery score’ (FIDS) may aid practitioners in predicting an increased likelihood of a failed operative vaginal birth and therefore to consider a trial of operative vaginal delivery in the theatre. Senior input should also be sought because a failed operative vaginal birth is associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-6469154acb834480adfdabdb09237bdb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-2727 2090-2735 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pregnancy |
| spelling | doaj-art-6469154acb834480adfdabdb09237bdb2025-02-03T05:43:51ZengWileyJournal of Pregnancy2090-27272090-27352015-01-01201510.1155/2015/627810627810Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in LondonSian McDonnell0Edwin Chandraharan1St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW 17 0RE, UKSt. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW 17 0RE, UKObjectives. To review the determinants for a failed operative vaginal delivery and to examine associated fetal and maternal morbidity. Design. Retrospective observational study. Setting. Large London Teaching Hospital. Method. A retrospective review of case notes during a 5-year period was carried out. Results. Overall 119 women (0.44%) out of 26,856 births had a caesarean section following a failed instrumental delivery, which comprised 5.1% of all operative vaginal births. 73% had a spontaneous onset of labour and 63% required syntocinon at some time prior to delivery. 71.5% of deliveries were complicated by malposition. Only 20% of deliveries were attended by a consultant obstetrician. Almost 50% of women and 8.4% of neonates sustained trauma at the time of either their failed instrumental delivery or the caesarean section. Conclusions. Emergency caesarean section during the second stage of labour is associated with maternal and fetal complications. A ‘failed instrumental delivery score’ (FIDS) may aid practitioners in predicting an increased likelihood of a failed operative vaginal birth and therefore to consider a trial of operative vaginal delivery in the theatre. Senior input should also be sought because a failed operative vaginal birth is associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/627810 |
| spellingShingle | Sian McDonnell Edwin Chandraharan Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London Journal of Pregnancy |
| title | Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London |
| title_full | Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London |
| title_fullStr | Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London |
| title_full_unstemmed | Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London |
| title_short | Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London |
| title_sort | determinants and outcomes of emergency caesarean section following failed instrumental delivery 5 year observational review at a tertiary referral centre in london |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/627810 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sianmcdonnell determinantsandoutcomesofemergencycaesareansectionfollowingfailedinstrumentaldelivery5yearobservationalreviewatatertiaryreferralcentreinlondon AT edwinchandraharan determinantsandoutcomesofemergencycaesareansectionfollowingfailedinstrumentaldelivery5yearobservationalreviewatatertiaryreferralcentreinlondon |