Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures

Objective. To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) for minimally invasive treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 98 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buxin Fan, Hansen Xiao, Peng Wu, Yao Du
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Emergency Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5957025
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563083739922432
author Buxin Fan
Hansen Xiao
Peng Wu
Yao Du
author_facet Buxin Fan
Hansen Xiao
Peng Wu
Yao Du
author_sort Buxin Fan
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) for minimally invasive treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 98 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 was used as the research object, and they were divided into PFNA group and PCCP group according to different treatment methods, with 51 cases and 47 cases. The intraoperative and postoperative indicators were compared between the two groups of patients. Results. There was no significant difference in the operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and Harris score of hip joint function between the two groups (t = −1.43, 1.86, 1.63; P>0.05). Compared with the PFNA group, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the PCCP group were lower than those in the PFNA group (t = 11.38, 9.66; P<0.05). Compared with the PFNA group, the time of weight-bearing in the PCCP group was longer than that in the PFNA group (t = −2.23, P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications was 7.84% in the PFNA group and 10.64% in the PCCP group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. The PFNA and PCCP are both effective measures for the clinical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, and internal fixation should be reasonably selected according to the specific conditions of the patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-6461ed1949a948b5975753aeae88e7e2
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2859
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Emergency Medicine International
spelling doaj-art-6461ed1949a948b5975753aeae88e7e22025-02-03T01:21:04ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28592022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5957025Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric FracturesBuxin Fan0Hansen Xiao1Peng Wu2Yao Du3Department of OrthopaedicsDepartment of OrthopaedicsDepartment of OrthopaedicsDepartment of OrthopaedicsObjective. To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) for minimally invasive treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 98 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 was used as the research object, and they were divided into PFNA group and PCCP group according to different treatment methods, with 51 cases and 47 cases. The intraoperative and postoperative indicators were compared between the two groups of patients. Results. There was no significant difference in the operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and Harris score of hip joint function between the two groups (t = −1.43, 1.86, 1.63; P>0.05). Compared with the PFNA group, the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the PCCP group were lower than those in the PFNA group (t = 11.38, 9.66; P<0.05). Compared with the PFNA group, the time of weight-bearing in the PCCP group was longer than that in the PFNA group (t = −2.23, P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications was 7.84% in the PFNA group and 10.64% in the PCCP group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. The PFNA and PCCP are both effective measures for the clinical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, and internal fixation should be reasonably selected according to the specific conditions of the patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5957025
spellingShingle Buxin Fan
Hansen Xiao
Peng Wu
Yao Du
Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
Emergency Medicine International
title Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_full Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_short Comparison of Curative Effect between PFNA and PCCP in the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures
title_sort comparison of curative effect between pfna and pccp in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5957025
work_keys_str_mv AT buxinfan comparisonofcurativeeffectbetweenpfnaandpccpinthetreatmentoffemoralintertrochantericfractures
AT hansenxiao comparisonofcurativeeffectbetweenpfnaandpccpinthetreatmentoffemoralintertrochantericfractures
AT pengwu comparisonofcurativeeffectbetweenpfnaandpccpinthetreatmentoffemoralintertrochantericfractures
AT yaodu comparisonofcurativeeffectbetweenpfnaandpccpinthetreatmentoffemoralintertrochantericfractures