Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.

<h4>Background</h4>Research on community (home or birth center) twin birth is scarce. This study evaluates outcomes of twin pregnancies entering care with a single community practitioner.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 100 consecutive twi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart J Fischbein, Rixa Freeze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313941
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850104892037791744
author Stuart J Fischbein
Rixa Freeze
author_facet Stuart J Fischbein
Rixa Freeze
author_sort Stuart J Fischbein
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Research on community (home or birth center) twin birth is scarce. This study evaluates outcomes of twin pregnancies entering care with a single community practitioner.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 100 consecutive twin pregnancies planning community births during a 12-year period. Outcomes measured included mode of birth; birth weights; Apgar scores; ante-, intra-, and post-partum transports; perineal integrity; birth interval; blood loss; chorionicity; weight concordance; and other maternal or neonatal morbidity.<h4>Results</h4>31 women (31%) transferred to a hospital-based clinician prior to labor. Of the 69 pregnancies still under the obstetrician's care when labor began, 79.7% (n = 55) were Dichorionic Diamniotic and 21.3% (n = 14) were Monochorionic Diamniotic. The vaginal birth rate was 91.3% (n = 63): 77.3% for primips and functional primips (no previous vaginal births) and 97.9% for multips. Six mothers (8.7%) had in-labor cesareans (1 multip and 5 primips). Rates of vaginal birth did not vary significantly by chorionicity. There were 8 transports in labor (11.6%): 2 vaginal and 6 cesareans. Average gestational age was 39.0 weeks (range 35-42). Compared to primiparas, multiparas had less perineal trauma and higher rates of vaginal birth and spontaneous vaginal birth. One twin infant and one mother required postpartum hospital transport. Of the babies born in a community setting, there was no serious morbidity requiring hospital treatment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A community birth can lead to high rates of vaginal birth and good outcomes for both mothers and babies in properly selected twin pregnancies. Community twin birth with midwifery style care under specific protocol guidelines and with a skilled practitioner may be a reasonable choice for women wishing to avoid a cesarean section-especially when there is no option of a hospital vaginal birth. Training all practitioners in vaginal twin and breech birth skills remains an imperative.
format Article
id doaj-art-6398275dfde04e54800aad4e807010e9
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-6398275dfde04e54800aad4e807010e92025-08-20T02:39:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011912e031394110.1371/journal.pone.0313941Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.Stuart J FischbeinRixa Freeze<h4>Background</h4>Research on community (home or birth center) twin birth is scarce. This study evaluates outcomes of twin pregnancies entering care with a single community practitioner.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 100 consecutive twin pregnancies planning community births during a 12-year period. Outcomes measured included mode of birth; birth weights; Apgar scores; ante-, intra-, and post-partum transports; perineal integrity; birth interval; blood loss; chorionicity; weight concordance; and other maternal or neonatal morbidity.<h4>Results</h4>31 women (31%) transferred to a hospital-based clinician prior to labor. Of the 69 pregnancies still under the obstetrician's care when labor began, 79.7% (n = 55) were Dichorionic Diamniotic and 21.3% (n = 14) were Monochorionic Diamniotic. The vaginal birth rate was 91.3% (n = 63): 77.3% for primips and functional primips (no previous vaginal births) and 97.9% for multips. Six mothers (8.7%) had in-labor cesareans (1 multip and 5 primips). Rates of vaginal birth did not vary significantly by chorionicity. There were 8 transports in labor (11.6%): 2 vaginal and 6 cesareans. Average gestational age was 39.0 weeks (range 35-42). Compared to primiparas, multiparas had less perineal trauma and higher rates of vaginal birth and spontaneous vaginal birth. One twin infant and one mother required postpartum hospital transport. Of the babies born in a community setting, there was no serious morbidity requiring hospital treatment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A community birth can lead to high rates of vaginal birth and good outcomes for both mothers and babies in properly selected twin pregnancies. Community twin birth with midwifery style care under specific protocol guidelines and with a skilled practitioner may be a reasonable choice for women wishing to avoid a cesarean section-especially when there is no option of a hospital vaginal birth. Training all practitioners in vaginal twin and breech birth skills remains an imperative.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313941
spellingShingle Stuart J Fischbein
Rixa Freeze
Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
PLoS ONE
title Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
title_full Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
title_fullStr Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
title_full_unstemmed Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
title_short Twin home birth: Outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner.
title_sort twin home birth outcomes of 100 sets of twins in the care of a single practitioner
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313941
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartjfischbein twinhomebirthoutcomesof100setsoftwinsinthecareofasinglepractitioner
AT rixafreeze twinhomebirthoutcomesof100setsoftwinsinthecareofasinglepractitioner