The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!

Background:. High-volume pancreatic surgery centers require a significant investment in expertise, time, and resources to achieve optimal patient outcomes. A detailed understanding of the economics of major pancreatic surgery is limited among many clinicians and hospital administrators. A greater co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nitzan Zohar, MD, Avinoam Nevler, MD, Sean P. Maher, Matthew C. Rosenthal, Florence Williams, Wilbur B. Bowne, MD, FACS, Charles J. Yeo, MD, FACS, Harish Lavu, MD, FACS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health 2024-03-01
Series:Annals of Surgery Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000362
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589701388697600
author Nitzan Zohar, MD
Avinoam Nevler, MD
Sean P. Maher
Matthew C. Rosenthal
Florence Williams
Wilbur B. Bowne, MD, FACS
Charles J. Yeo, MD, FACS
Harish Lavu, MD, FACS
author_facet Nitzan Zohar, MD
Avinoam Nevler, MD
Sean P. Maher
Matthew C. Rosenthal
Florence Williams
Wilbur B. Bowne, MD, FACS
Charles J. Yeo, MD, FACS
Harish Lavu, MD, FACS
author_sort Nitzan Zohar, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background:. High-volume pancreatic surgery centers require a significant investment in expertise, time, and resources to achieve optimal patient outcomes. A detailed understanding of the economics of major pancreatic surgery is limited among many clinicians and hospital administrators. A greater consideration of these financial aspects may in fact have implications for enhancing clinical care and for a broader sustainability of high-volume pancreatic surgery programs. Methods:. In this retrospective observational study, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), total pancreatectomy, or distal pancreatectomy at one academic medical center during the fiscal year 2021 were evaluated. Detailed hospital charges and professional fees were obtained for patients using the Qlik perioperative database. Clinical data for the study cohort were gathered from a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved pancreatic surgery database. Charges for the 91-day perioperative period were included. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:. During the study period, 159 evaluable patients underwent 1 of 3 designated pancreatic resections included in the analysis. Ninety-seven patients (61%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 70% (n = 110) underwent PD. The total charges (combined professional and hospital charges) for the cohort encompassing the entire perioperative period were $20,661,759. The median charge per patient was $130,306 (interquartile range [IQR], $34,534). The median direct cost of care was $23,219 (IQR, $6321) and the median contribution margin per case was $10,092 (IQR, $22,949). The median surgeon professional fee charges were $7700 per patient (IQR, $1296) as compared to $3453 (IQR, $1,144) for professional fee receipts (45% of the surgeon charge). The differences between the professional fee charges and receipts per patient were also considerable for other health care professionals such as anesthesiologists ($4945 charges vs $1406 receipts [28%]) and pathologists ($3035 charges vs $680 receipts [22%]). The surgeon professional fees were only 6% of the total charges, while the professional fees for anesthesiology and pathology were 4% and 2% of the total charges, respectively. Supply charges were 3% of the total charges. Longer operative time was correlated with increased hospital and anesthesia charges, without a significant increase in surgeon charges (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.2, respectively). Male sex, diabetes, and low serum albumin correlated with greater total hospital charges (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions:. The role of the surgeon in the perioperative clinical care of major pancreatic resection patients is crucial and important and is by no means limited to the operative day. Nevertheless, in the context of the current US health care system, the reimbursement to the surgeon in the form of professional fees is a relatively small fraction of the total health care receipts for these patients. This imbalance necessitates a substantial financial partnership between hospitals and their pancreatic surgery units to ensure the long-term viability of these programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-6363be6afff544eca61a9730b8866cd2
institution Kabale University
issn 2691-3593
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Surgery Open
spelling doaj-art-6363be6afff544eca61a9730b8866cd22025-01-24T09:18:25ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932024-03-0151e36210.1097/AS9.0000000000000362202403000-00001The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!Nitzan Zohar, MD0Avinoam Nevler, MD1Sean P. Maher2Matthew C. Rosenthal3Florence Williams4Wilbur B. Bowne, MD, FACS5Charles J. Yeo, MD, FACS6Harish Lavu, MD, FACS7From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.From the * Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.Background:. High-volume pancreatic surgery centers require a significant investment in expertise, time, and resources to achieve optimal patient outcomes. A detailed understanding of the economics of major pancreatic surgery is limited among many clinicians and hospital administrators. A greater consideration of these financial aspects may in fact have implications for enhancing clinical care and for a broader sustainability of high-volume pancreatic surgery programs. Methods:. In this retrospective observational study, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), total pancreatectomy, or distal pancreatectomy at one academic medical center during the fiscal year 2021 were evaluated. Detailed hospital charges and professional fees were obtained for patients using the Qlik perioperative database. Clinical data for the study cohort were gathered from a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved pancreatic surgery database. Charges for the 91-day perioperative period were included. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results:. During the study period, 159 evaluable patients underwent 1 of 3 designated pancreatic resections included in the analysis. Ninety-seven patients (61%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 70% (n = 110) underwent PD. The total charges (combined professional and hospital charges) for the cohort encompassing the entire perioperative period were $20,661,759. The median charge per patient was $130,306 (interquartile range [IQR], $34,534). The median direct cost of care was $23,219 (IQR, $6321) and the median contribution margin per case was $10,092 (IQR, $22,949). The median surgeon professional fee charges were $7700 per patient (IQR, $1296) as compared to $3453 (IQR, $1,144) for professional fee receipts (45% of the surgeon charge). The differences between the professional fee charges and receipts per patient were also considerable for other health care professionals such as anesthesiologists ($4945 charges vs $1406 receipts [28%]) and pathologists ($3035 charges vs $680 receipts [22%]). The surgeon professional fees were only 6% of the total charges, while the professional fees for anesthesiology and pathology were 4% and 2% of the total charges, respectively. Supply charges were 3% of the total charges. Longer operative time was correlated with increased hospital and anesthesia charges, without a significant increase in surgeon charges (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.2, respectively). Male sex, diabetes, and low serum albumin correlated with greater total hospital charges (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions:. The role of the surgeon in the perioperative clinical care of major pancreatic resection patients is crucial and important and is by no means limited to the operative day. Nevertheless, in the context of the current US health care system, the reimbursement to the surgeon in the form of professional fees is a relatively small fraction of the total health care receipts for these patients. This imbalance necessitates a substantial financial partnership between hospitals and their pancreatic surgery units to ensure the long-term viability of these programs.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000362
spellingShingle Nitzan Zohar, MD
Avinoam Nevler, MD
Sean P. Maher
Matthew C. Rosenthal
Florence Williams
Wilbur B. Bowne, MD, FACS
Charles J. Yeo, MD, FACS
Harish Lavu, MD, FACS
The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
Annals of Surgery Open
title The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
title_full The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
title_fullStr The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
title_full_unstemmed The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
title_short The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!
title_sort financial implications of pancreatic surgery the hospital is the big winner not the surgeon
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000362
work_keys_str_mv AT nitzanzoharmd thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT avinoamnevlermd thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT seanpmaher thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT matthewcrosenthal thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT florencewilliams thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT wilburbbownemdfacs thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT charlesjyeomdfacs thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT harishlavumdfacs thefinancialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT nitzanzoharmd financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT avinoamnevlermd financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT seanpmaher financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT matthewcrosenthal financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT florencewilliams financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT wilburbbownemdfacs financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT charlesjyeomdfacs financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon
AT harishlavumdfacs financialimplicationsofpancreaticsurgerythehospitalisthebigwinnernotthesurgeon