Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity

I review the conflicting injunctions to archive and not to archive anthropological field materials (data). There are ethical contradictions: some ethics codes tell us to destroy data after a period of time, others to save for the long term. I discuss the responsibilities researchers have to differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Zeitlyn
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Laboratoire d'Ethnologie et de Sociologie Comparative 2022-03-01
Series:Ateliers d'Anthropologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ateliers/16318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578637552943104
author David Zeitlyn
author_facet David Zeitlyn
author_sort David Zeitlyn
collection DOAJ
description I review the conflicting injunctions to archive and not to archive anthropological field materials (data). There are ethical contradictions: some ethics codes tell us to destroy data after a period of time, others to save for the long term. I discuss the responsibilities researchers have to different groups of people and how these may conflict. I illustrate beneficial long-term uses of field data from my own work with Mambila people in Cameroon and Nigeria, partly using archival material in ways never originally intended (so never considered for consent). To adhere strictly to some data management protocols would result in inhumane and I suggest unethical action. We must accept that life is contradictory and find ways of managing this: long term embargoes might provide a solution that is workable, although difficult to implement with digital archives.
format Article
id doaj-art-631141353009472bad518f1c2cbbd40f
institution Kabale University
issn 2117-3869
language fra
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Laboratoire d'Ethnologie et de Sociologie Comparative
record_format Article
series Ateliers d'Anthropologie
spelling doaj-art-631141353009472bad518f1c2cbbd40f2025-01-30T13:42:32ZfraLaboratoire d'Ethnologie et de Sociologie ComparativeAteliers d'Anthropologie2117-38692022-03-015110.4000/ateliers.16318Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessityDavid ZeitlynI review the conflicting injunctions to archive and not to archive anthropological field materials (data). There are ethical contradictions: some ethics codes tell us to destroy data after a period of time, others to save for the long term. I discuss the responsibilities researchers have to different groups of people and how these may conflict. I illustrate beneficial long-term uses of field data from my own work with Mambila people in Cameroon and Nigeria, partly using archival material in ways never originally intended (so never considered for consent). To adhere strictly to some data management protocols would result in inhumane and I suggest unethical action. We must accept that life is contradictory and find ways of managing this: long term embargoes might provide a solution that is workable, although difficult to implement with digital archives.https://journals.openedition.org/ateliers/16318CameroonNigeriaethnographic archivesfield notesanthropological ethicsresponsibility across time
spellingShingle David Zeitlyn
Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
Ateliers d'Anthropologie
Cameroon
Nigeria
ethnographic archives
field notes
anthropological ethics
responsibility across time
title Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
title_full Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
title_fullStr Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
title_full_unstemmed Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
title_short Archiving ethnography? The impossibility and the necessity
title_sort archiving ethnography the impossibility and the necessity
topic Cameroon
Nigeria
ethnographic archives
field notes
anthropological ethics
responsibility across time
url https://journals.openedition.org/ateliers/16318
work_keys_str_mv AT davidzeitlyn archivingethnographytheimpossibilityandthenecessity