The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation

Fair allocation of organs to candidates listed for transplantation is fundamental to organ-donation policies. Processes leading to listing decisions are neither regulated nor understood. We explored whether patient characteristics affected timeliness of listing using population-based data on 144,507...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cindy L. Bryce, Chung-Chou Ho Chang, Derek C. Angus, Robert M. Arnold, Maxwell Farrell, Mark S. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/467976
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562605639598080
author Cindy L. Bryce
Chung-Chou Ho Chang
Derek C. Angus
Robert M. Arnold
Maxwell Farrell
Mark S. Roberts
author_facet Cindy L. Bryce
Chung-Chou Ho Chang
Derek C. Angus
Robert M. Arnold
Maxwell Farrell
Mark S. Roberts
author_sort Cindy L. Bryce
collection DOAJ
description Fair allocation of organs to candidates listed for transplantation is fundamental to organ-donation policies. Processes leading to listing decisions are neither regulated nor understood. We explored whether patient characteristics affected timeliness of listing using population-based data on 144,507 adults hospitalized with liver-related disease in Pennsylvania. We linked hospitalizations to other secondary data and found 3,071 listed for transplants, 1,537 received transplants, and 57,020 died. Among candidates, 61% (n=1,879) and 85.5% (n=2,626) were listed within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis; 26.7% (n=1,130) and 95% (n=1,468) of recipients were transplanted within 1 and 3 years of listing. Using competing-risks models, we found few overall differences by sex, but both black patients and those insured by Medicare and Medicaid (combined) waited longer before being listed. Patients with combined Medicare and Medicaid insurance, as well as those with Medicaid alone, were also more likely to die without ever being listed. Once listed, the time to transplant was slightly longer for women, but it did not differ by race/ethnicity or insurance. The early time period from diagnosis to listing for liver transplantation reveals unwanted variation related to demographics that jeopardizes overall fairness of organ allocation and needs to be further explored.
format Article
id doaj-art-62e97e73116646e185e6d3e13129b2fd
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0007
2090-0015
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-62e97e73116646e185e6d3e13129b2fd2025-02-03T01:22:10ZengWileyJournal of Transplantation2090-00072090-00152010-01-01201010.1155/2010/467976467976The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver TransplantationCindy L. Bryce0Chung-Chou Ho Chang1Derek C. Angus2Robert M. Arnold3Maxwell Farrell4Mark S. Roberts5Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USAThe Clinical Research Investigation and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USADivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USAFair allocation of organs to candidates listed for transplantation is fundamental to organ-donation policies. Processes leading to listing decisions are neither regulated nor understood. We explored whether patient characteristics affected timeliness of listing using population-based data on 144,507 adults hospitalized with liver-related disease in Pennsylvania. We linked hospitalizations to other secondary data and found 3,071 listed for transplants, 1,537 received transplants, and 57,020 died. Among candidates, 61% (n=1,879) and 85.5% (n=2,626) were listed within 1 and 3 years of diagnosis; 26.7% (n=1,130) and 95% (n=1,468) of recipients were transplanted within 1 and 3 years of listing. Using competing-risks models, we found few overall differences by sex, but both black patients and those insured by Medicare and Medicaid (combined) waited longer before being listed. Patients with combined Medicare and Medicaid insurance, as well as those with Medicaid alone, were also more likely to die without ever being listed. Once listed, the time to transplant was slightly longer for women, but it did not differ by race/ethnicity or insurance. The early time period from diagnosis to listing for liver transplantation reveals unwanted variation related to demographics that jeopardizes overall fairness of organ allocation and needs to be further explored.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/467976
spellingShingle Cindy L. Bryce
Chung-Chou Ho Chang
Derek C. Angus
Robert M. Arnold
Maxwell Farrell
Mark S. Roberts
The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
Journal of Transplantation
title The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
title_full The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
title_fullStr The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
title_short The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation
title_sort effect of race sex and insurance status on time to listing decisions for liver transplantation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/467976
work_keys_str_mv AT cindylbryce theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT chungchouhochang theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT derekcangus theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT robertmarnold theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT maxwellfarrell theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT marksroberts theeffectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT cindylbryce effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT chungchouhochang effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT derekcangus effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT robertmarnold effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT maxwellfarrell effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation
AT marksroberts effectofracesexandinsurancestatusontimetolistingdecisionsforlivertransplantation