Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke

We aimed to investigate differences between the influence of observing one’s own actions and those of others in patients with stroke with hemiplegia. Thirty-four patients with stroke who had experienced a right or left hemispheric lesion (RHL: n = 17; LHL: n = 17) participated in this study. Partici...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takeshi Fuchigami, Shu Morioka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3083248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560112027303936
author Takeshi Fuchigami
Shu Morioka
author_facet Takeshi Fuchigami
Shu Morioka
author_sort Takeshi Fuchigami
collection DOAJ
description We aimed to investigate differences between the influence of observing one’s own actions and those of others in patients with stroke with hemiplegia. Thirty-four patients with stroke who had experienced a right or left hemispheric lesion (RHL: n = 17; LHL: n = 17) participated in this study. Participants viewed video clips (0.5× speed) of their own stepping movements (SO) as well as those of others (OO). After viewing the video clips, participants were asked to evaluate the vividness of the mental image of the observed stepping movement using a five-point scale, in accordance with that utilized in the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). We also examined changes in imagery and execution times following action observation. When all patients were considered, there were no significant differences between SO and OO conditions. However, in the RHL subgroup, KVIQ kinesthetic subscore and changes in imagery and execution times were greater in the OO condition than in the SO condition. In the LHL subgroup, changes in imagery times were greater in the SO condition than in the OO condition. These findings indicated that viewing the movements of others led to more vivid imagery and alteration in performance in patients with right-sided stroke, when compared to viewing one’s own movements. Therefore, the present study suggests that clinicians should consider the side of the damaged hemisphere when implementing action observation therapy for patients with stroke.
format Article
id doaj-art-62c125644ac447fc87a2e5809c71c577
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-62c125644ac447fc87a2e5809c71c5772025-02-03T01:28:24ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562019-01-01201910.1155/2019/30832483083248Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with StrokeTakeshi Fuchigami0Shu Morioka1Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, JapanDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, JapanWe aimed to investigate differences between the influence of observing one’s own actions and those of others in patients with stroke with hemiplegia. Thirty-four patients with stroke who had experienced a right or left hemispheric lesion (RHL: n = 17; LHL: n = 17) participated in this study. Participants viewed video clips (0.5× speed) of their own stepping movements (SO) as well as those of others (OO). After viewing the video clips, participants were asked to evaluate the vividness of the mental image of the observed stepping movement using a five-point scale, in accordance with that utilized in the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). We also examined changes in imagery and execution times following action observation. When all patients were considered, there were no significant differences between SO and OO conditions. However, in the RHL subgroup, KVIQ kinesthetic subscore and changes in imagery and execution times were greater in the OO condition than in the SO condition. In the LHL subgroup, changes in imagery times were greater in the SO condition than in the OO condition. These findings indicated that viewing the movements of others led to more vivid imagery and alteration in performance in patients with right-sided stroke, when compared to viewing one’s own movements. Therefore, the present study suggests that clinicians should consider the side of the damaged hemisphere when implementing action observation therapy for patients with stroke.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3083248
spellingShingle Takeshi Fuchigami
Shu Morioka
Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
Stroke Research and Treatment
title Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
title_full Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
title_fullStr Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
title_short Differences between the Influence of Observing One’s Own Movements and Those of Others in Patients with Stroke
title_sort differences between the influence of observing one s own movements and those of others in patients with stroke
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3083248
work_keys_str_mv AT takeshifuchigami differencesbetweentheinfluenceofobservingonesownmovementsandthoseofothersinpatientswithstroke
AT shumorioka differencesbetweentheinfluenceofobservingonesownmovementsandthoseofothersinpatientswithstroke