Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
Abstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all typ...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832571929848971264 |
---|---|
author | Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza Jordana Barbosa-Silva Douglas P. Gross Bruno R. da Costa Nikolaus Ballenberger Tiago V. Pereira Liz Dennett Susan Armijo-Olivo |
author_facet | Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza Jordana Barbosa-Silva Douglas P. Gross Bruno R. da Costa Nikolaus Ballenberger Tiago V. Pereira Liz Dennett Susan Armijo-Olivo |
author_sort | Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-62ad23a95f00466583d0dd8f07d8408c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2046-4053 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Systematic Reviews |
spelling | doaj-art-62ad23a95f00466583d0dd8f07d8408c2025-02-02T12:11:00ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532025-01-0114111310.1186/s13643-024-02737-4Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysisAna Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza0Jordana Barbosa-Silva1Douglas P. Gross2Bruno R. da Costa3Nikolaus Ballenberger4Tiago V. Pereira5Liz Dennett6Susan Armijo-Olivo7University of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of AlbertaClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield, Department of Population Health, University of OxfordUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield, Department of Population Health, University of OxfordFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of AlbertaUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückAbstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4Neck painManual TherapyExercise TherapyPharmacotherapyPatient EducationNetwork Meta-Analysis |
spellingShingle | Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza Jordana Barbosa-Silva Douglas P. Gross Bruno R. da Costa Nikolaus Ballenberger Tiago V. Pereira Liz Dennett Susan Armijo-Olivo Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis Systematic Reviews Neck pain Manual Therapy Exercise Therapy Pharmacotherapy Patient Education Network Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of manual therapy pharmacological treatment exercise therapy and education for neck pain compete study protocol of a systematic review with network meta analysis |
topic | Neck pain Manual Therapy Exercise Therapy Pharmacotherapy Patient Education Network Meta-Analysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anaizabelasobraldeoliveirasouza comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT jordanabarbosasilva comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT douglaspgross comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT brunordacosta comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT nikolausballenberger comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT tiagovpereira comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT lizdennett comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis AT susanarmijoolivo comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis |