Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis

Abstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all typ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza, Jordana Barbosa-Silva, Douglas P. Gross, Bruno R. da Costa, Nikolaus Ballenberger, Tiago V. Pereira, Liz Dennett, Susan Armijo-Olivo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571929848971264
author Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza
Jordana Barbosa-Silva
Douglas P. Gross
Bruno R. da Costa
Nikolaus Ballenberger
Tiago V. Pereira
Liz Dennett
Susan Armijo-Olivo
author_facet Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza
Jordana Barbosa-Silva
Douglas P. Gross
Bruno R. da Costa
Nikolaus Ballenberger
Tiago V. Pereira
Liz Dennett
Susan Armijo-Olivo
author_sort Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-62ad23a95f00466583d0dd8f07d8408c
institution Kabale University
issn 2046-4053
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj-art-62ad23a95f00466583d0dd8f07d8408c2025-02-02T12:11:00ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532025-01-0114111310.1186/s13643-024-02737-4Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysisAna Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza0Jordana Barbosa-Silva1Douglas P. Gross2Bruno R. da Costa3Nikolaus Ballenberger4Tiago V. Pereira5Liz Dennett6Susan Armijo-Olivo7University of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of AlbertaClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield, Department of Population Health, University of OxfordUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield, Department of Population Health, University of OxfordFaculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of AlbertaUniversity of Applied Sciences – Hochschule OsnabrückAbstract Background and context of the study Neck pain is a prevalent and globally burdensome problem. Clinical practice guidelines have recommended conservative treatments such as education, exercise therapy (ET), manual therapy (MT), and pharmacological therapy (i.e., medication) to manage all types of neck pain based on the chronicity of the disease (acute, subacute, and chronic pain). However, there is scarce evidence to determine which interventions constitute the most effective strategy for this condition. Research question What are the best conservative treatment options (i.e., ET, MT, education, and/or medication) to relieve pain and disability-related outcomes in patients with neck pain? The overall purpose of the study (1) To identify which type of conservative treatment (education, ET, MT, and/or medication) and their combinations have the greatest probability of being most effective for neck pain using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach. (2) To rank these conservative treatments in terms of safety (when possible) and effectiveness for managing neck pain. Methodology Systematic review (SR) with NMA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies should include adults (aged > 18) with neck pain who received any of the interventions of interest (education, ET, MT, and medication). The main outcome will be pain intensity. Searches will be conducted in Ovid Medline All®, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Scopus, and Cochrane Library Trials database. No language or publication date restrictions will be applied. The revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB-2) will be used to evaluate RoB, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). NMAs will be conducted to rank interventions according to their effectiveness and safety (when possible), allowing a comprehensive analysis of all available evidence, with different nodes specified for all conservative interventions of interest, placebo, sham therapy, and non-intervention control. Major findings/summary of interpretations/conclusions This NMA will help clinicians and the scientific community choose the most effective strategy or combinations of strategies for treating neck pain. The information gathered in this project will inform decision-making and guide personalized care of individual patients in the future.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4Neck painManual TherapyExercise TherapyPharmacotherapyPatient EducationNetwork Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle Ana Izabela Sobral de Oliveira-Souza
Jordana Barbosa-Silva
Douglas P. Gross
Bruno R. da Costa
Nikolaus Ballenberger
Tiago V. Pereira
Liz Dennett
Susan Armijo-Olivo
Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
Systematic Reviews
Neck pain
Manual Therapy
Exercise Therapy
Pharmacotherapy
Patient Education
Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative effectiveness of manual therapy, pharmacological treatment, exercise therapy, and education for neck pain (COMPETE study): protocol of a systematic review with network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of manual therapy pharmacological treatment exercise therapy and education for neck pain compete study protocol of a systematic review with network meta analysis
topic Neck pain
Manual Therapy
Exercise Therapy
Pharmacotherapy
Patient Education
Network Meta-Analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02737-4
work_keys_str_mv AT anaizabelasobraldeoliveirasouza comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jordanabarbosasilva comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT douglaspgross comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT brunordacosta comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT nikolausballenberger comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT tiagovpereira comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lizdennett comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis
AT susanarmijoolivo comparativeeffectivenessofmanualtherapypharmacologicaltreatmentexercisetherapyandeducationforneckpaincompetestudyprotocolofasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysis