Deep Learning Image Reconstruction to Improve Computed Tomography Image Quality of the Phantom with Standard Liver Density
Objective: This study aimed to compare the quality of reconstructed images by deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) techniques at different scan doses using a phantom with liver density. Methods: The Gammex computed tomography (CT) pha...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Computerized Tomography Theory and Application
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | CT Lilun yu yingyong yanjiu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cttacn.org.cn/cn/article/doi/10.15953/j.ctta.2024.056 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Objective: This study aimed to compare the quality of reconstructed images by deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) techniques at different scan doses using a phantom with liver density. Methods: The Gammex computed tomography (CT) phantom with a standard liver-density insert (ρew=1.06) was scanned at six different radiation doses (CTDIvol): 30, 20, 15, 10, 7.5, and 4.5 mGy). Images obtained at each dose were reconstructed using DLIR and ASIR-V. Image quality was analyzed through the imQuest software. The quality of reconstructed images by DLIR at 4.5 mGy (lowest radiation dose) and ASIR-V at 15 mGy (recommended scan dose) were compared using the Bland–Altman method. Results: Across the six doses, DLIR significantly outperformed ASIR-V in key metrics, such as noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and detectability index (\begin{document}$d' $\end{document}). Bland–Altman analysis indicated that the quality of reconstructed images by DLIR at 4.5 mGy was significantly better to those by ASIR-V at 15 mGy. The noise level of DLIR images at 4.5 mGy was (17.41±0.32), which is significantly lower than that of ASIR-V at 15 mGy (21.17±0.67). At 4.5 mGy, DLIR SNR, CNR, and d’ were (3.21±0.24), (3.42±0.35), and (8.81±0.63), respectively, which are significantly higher than that of ASIR-V at 15 mGy (2.69±0.14), (2.87±0.11), and (5.61±1.28), respectively. Conclusion: In CT scan of focal liver-density lesions using a phantom, DLIR significantly improved the SNR, CNR, and d’ values and reduced image noise compared to ASIR-V. DLIR was able to achieve better quality image reconstruction at 4.5 mGy than the conventional ASIR-V reconstruction at 15 mGy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1004-4140 |