Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study

Background and Aims: Upper abdominal surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block blocks both anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. We compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of unilateral EOI block with conventional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shruti Shrey, Chandni Sinha, Abhyuday Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Sreehari Nambiar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-11-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_596_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587216789962752
author Shruti Shrey
Chandni Sinha
Abhyuday Kumar
Ajeet Kumar
Amarjeet Kumar
Sreehari Nambiar
author_facet Shruti Shrey
Chandni Sinha
Abhyuday Kumar
Ajeet Kumar
Amarjeet Kumar
Sreehari Nambiar
author_sort Shruti Shrey
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Upper abdominal surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block blocks both anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. We compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of unilateral EOI block with conventional unilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Methods: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery via subcostal incision were randomly assigned to receive either EOI block (Group E) or subcostal TAP block (Group T) with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, these patients received intravenous (IV) fentanyl through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump with settings of demand-only mode. The primary outcome was the time to activation of PCA postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (at 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours), patient satisfaction scores (48 hours), and block-related complications. Unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Patients in Group E had an increased mean time of activation of PCA [610.28 [standard deviation (SD): 118.95)] minutes vs 409.68 (SD: 101.36) minutes] (P = 0.001). The 24-hour postoperative mean fentanyl consumption was 102.40 (SD: 25.70) μg in Group E versus 123.20 (SD: 34.38) μg in Group T (P = 0.019). Patients in Group E had better satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). Pain scores were better at 30 minutes and 6 hours. Conclusion: EOI block provides effective postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgeries as it prolongs the duration of PCA activation with a better patient satisfaction score.
format Article
id doaj-art-62769df0728d489987ba2e50fe0f22f3
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-62769df0728d489987ba2e50fe0f22f32025-01-24T15:12:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172024-11-01681196597010.4103/ija.ija_596_24Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical studyShruti ShreyChandni SinhaAbhyuday KumarAjeet KumarAmarjeet KumarSreehari NambiarBackground and Aims: Upper abdominal surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. External oblique intercostal (EOI) block blocks both anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. We compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of unilateral EOI block with conventional unilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Methods: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery via subcostal incision were randomly assigned to receive either EOI block (Group E) or subcostal TAP block (Group T) with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, these patients received intravenous (IV) fentanyl through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump with settings of demand-only mode. The primary outcome was the time to activation of PCA postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour opioid consumption, pain scores (at 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours), patient satisfaction scores (48 hours), and block-related complications. Unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Patients in Group E had an increased mean time of activation of PCA [610.28 [standard deviation (SD): 118.95)] minutes vs 409.68 (SD: 101.36) minutes] (P = 0.001). The 24-hour postoperative mean fentanyl consumption was 102.40 (SD: 25.70) μg in Group E versus 123.20 (SD: 34.38) μg in Group T (P = 0.019). Patients in Group E had better satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). Pain scores were better at 30 minutes and 6 hours. Conclusion: EOI block provides effective postoperative analgesia in upper abdominal surgeries as it prolongs the duration of PCA activation with a better patient satisfaction score.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_596_24abdominal surgeryexternal oblique intercostal blockfentanylpatient-controlled analgesiapatient satisfactionpostoperative painsubcostal transversus abdominis plane block
spellingShingle Shruti Shrey
Chandni Sinha
Abhyuday Kumar
Ajeet Kumar
Amarjeet Kumar
Sreehari Nambiar
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
abdominal surgery
external oblique intercostal block
fentanyl
patient-controlled analgesia
patient satisfaction
postoperative pain
subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
title Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
title_full Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
title_fullStr Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
title_short Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A randomised clinical study
title_sort comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided external oblique intercostal plane block and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery a randomised clinical study
topic abdominal surgery
external oblique intercostal block
fentanyl
patient-controlled analgesia
patient satisfaction
postoperative pain
subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_596_24
work_keys_str_mv AT shrutishrey comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT chandnisinha comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT abhyudaykumar comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT ajeetkumar comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT amarjeetkumar comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy
AT sreeharinambiar comparisonofanalgesicefficacyofultrasoundguidedexternalobliqueintercostalplaneblockandsubcostaltransversusabdominisplaneblockinpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgeryarandomisedclinicalstudy