Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making

Life-cycle (LC) approaches play a significant role in energy policy making to determine the environmental impacts associated with the choice of energy source. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be combined with LC approaches to provide quantitative benchmarks that orientate the performance of energ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian Vázquez-Rowe, Diego Iribarren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/813921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554285402947584
author Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Diego Iribarren
author_facet Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Diego Iribarren
author_sort Ian Vázquez-Rowe
collection DOAJ
description Life-cycle (LC) approaches play a significant role in energy policy making to determine the environmental impacts associated with the choice of energy source. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be combined with LC approaches to provide quantitative benchmarks that orientate the performance of energy systems towards environmental sustainability, with different implications depending on the selected LC + DEA method. The present paper examines currently available LC + DEA methods and develops a novel method combining carbon footprinting (CFP) and DEA. Thus, the CFP + DEA method is proposed, a five-step structure including data collection for multiple homogenous entities, calculation of target operating points, evaluation of current and target carbon footprints, and result interpretation. As the current context for energy policy implies an anthropocentric perspective with focus on the global warming impact of energy systems, the CFP + DEA method is foreseen to be the most consistent LC + DEA approach to provide benchmarks for energy policy making. The fact that this method relies on the definition of operating points with optimised resource intensity helps to moderate the concerns about the omission of other environmental impacts. Moreover, the CFP + DEA method benefits from CFP specifications in terms of flexibility, understanding, and reporting.
format Article
id doaj-art-622d7da2792244e5ba6b59cb0ffb94bb
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-622d7da2792244e5ba6b59cb0ffb94bb2025-02-03T05:51:57ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/813921813921Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy MakingIan Vázquez-Rowe0Diego Iribarren1Public Research Centre Henri Tudor (CRPHT)/Resource Centre for Environmental Technologies (CRTE), 6A Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgPublic Research Centre Henri Tudor (CRPHT)/Resource Centre for Environmental Technologies (CRTE), 6A Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, 4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgLife-cycle (LC) approaches play a significant role in energy policy making to determine the environmental impacts associated with the choice of energy source. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) can be combined with LC approaches to provide quantitative benchmarks that orientate the performance of energy systems towards environmental sustainability, with different implications depending on the selected LC + DEA method. The present paper examines currently available LC + DEA methods and develops a novel method combining carbon footprinting (CFP) and DEA. Thus, the CFP + DEA method is proposed, a five-step structure including data collection for multiple homogenous entities, calculation of target operating points, evaluation of current and target carbon footprints, and result interpretation. As the current context for energy policy implies an anthropocentric perspective with focus on the global warming impact of energy systems, the CFP + DEA method is foreseen to be the most consistent LC + DEA approach to provide benchmarks for energy policy making. The fact that this method relies on the definition of operating points with optimised resource intensity helps to moderate the concerns about the omission of other environmental impacts. Moreover, the CFP + DEA method benefits from CFP specifications in terms of flexibility, understanding, and reporting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/813921
spellingShingle Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Diego Iribarren
Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
The Scientific World Journal
title Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
title_full Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
title_fullStr Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
title_full_unstemmed Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
title_short Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making
title_sort review of life cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis launching the cfp dea method for energy policy making
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/813921
work_keys_str_mv AT ianvazquezrowe reviewoflifecycleapproachescoupledwithdataenvelopmentanalysislaunchingthecfpdeamethodforenergypolicymaking
AT diegoiribarren reviewoflifecycleapproachescoupledwithdataenvelopmentanalysislaunchingthecfpdeamethodforenergypolicymaking