Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

Both efficacy and clinical feasibility deserve consideration in translation of research outcomes. This study evaluated the feasibility of rehabilitation programs within the context of a large randomized controlled trial of physical therapy. Ambulant participants with Parkinson's disease (PD) (n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer L. McGinley, Clarissa Martin, Frances E. Huxham, Hylton B. Menz, Mary Danoudis, Anna T. Murphy, Jennifer J. Watts, Robert Iansek, Meg E. Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795294
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563016373108736
author Jennifer L. McGinley
Clarissa Martin
Frances E. Huxham
Hylton B. Menz
Mary Danoudis
Anna T. Murphy
Jennifer J. Watts
Robert Iansek
Meg E. Morris
author_facet Jennifer L. McGinley
Clarissa Martin
Frances E. Huxham
Hylton B. Menz
Mary Danoudis
Anna T. Murphy
Jennifer J. Watts
Robert Iansek
Meg E. Morris
author_sort Jennifer L. McGinley
collection DOAJ
description Both efficacy and clinical feasibility deserve consideration in translation of research outcomes. This study evaluated the feasibility of rehabilitation programs within the context of a large randomized controlled trial of physical therapy. Ambulant participants with Parkinson's disease (PD) (n=210) were randomized into three groups: (1) progressive strength training (PST); (2) movement strategy training (MST); or (3) control (“life skills”). PST and MST included fall prevention education. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of safety, retention, adherence, and compliance measures. Time to first fall during the intervention phase did not differ across groups, and adverse effects were minimal. Retention was high; only eight participants withdrew during or after the intervention phase. Strong adherence (attendance >80%) did not differ between groups (P=.435). Compliance in the therapy groups was high. All three programs proved feasible, suggesting they may be safely implemented for people with PD in community-based clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-60da5470946943fc8db3c425e3155499
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8083
2042-0080
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Parkinson's Disease
spelling doaj-art-60da5470946943fc8db3c425e31554992025-02-03T01:21:08ZengWileyParkinson's Disease2090-80832042-00802012-01-01201210.1155/2012/795294795294Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's DiseaseJennifer L. McGinley0Clarissa Martin1Frances E. Huxham2Hylton B. Menz3Mary Danoudis4Anna T. Murphy5Jennifer J. Watts6Robert Iansek7Meg E. Morris8Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaMusculoskeletal Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaNational Parkinson Foundation Center of Excellence, Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders and Gait and Victorian Comprehensive Parkinson's Program, Kingston Centre, Warrigal Road, Cheltenham, VIC 3192, AustraliaMelbourne School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3010, AustraliaBoth efficacy and clinical feasibility deserve consideration in translation of research outcomes. This study evaluated the feasibility of rehabilitation programs within the context of a large randomized controlled trial of physical therapy. Ambulant participants with Parkinson's disease (PD) (n=210) were randomized into three groups: (1) progressive strength training (PST); (2) movement strategy training (MST); or (3) control (“life skills”). PST and MST included fall prevention education. Feasibility was evaluated in terms of safety, retention, adherence, and compliance measures. Time to first fall during the intervention phase did not differ across groups, and adverse effects were minimal. Retention was high; only eight participants withdrew during or after the intervention phase. Strong adherence (attendance >80%) did not differ between groups (P=.435). Compliance in the therapy groups was high. All three programs proved feasible, suggesting they may be safely implemented for people with PD in community-based clinical practice.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795294
spellingShingle Jennifer L. McGinley
Clarissa Martin
Frances E. Huxham
Hylton B. Menz
Mary Danoudis
Anna T. Murphy
Jennifer J. Watts
Robert Iansek
Meg E. Morris
Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease
title Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
title_full Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
title_fullStr Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
title_short Feasibility, Safety, and Compliance in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Physical Therapy for Parkinson's Disease
title_sort feasibility safety and compliance in a randomized controlled trial of physical therapy for parkinson s disease
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795294
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferlmcginley feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT clarissamartin feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT francesehuxham feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT hyltonbmenz feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT marydanoudis feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT annatmurphy feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT jenniferjwatts feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT robertiansek feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease
AT megemorris feasibilitysafetyandcomplianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialofphysicaltherapyforparkinsonsdisease