Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training

The college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth A. Dennis, Kerry L. Potter, Paul A. Estabrooks, Brenda M. Davy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565383628849152
author Elizabeth A. Dennis
Kerry L. Potter
Paul A. Estabrooks
Brenda M. Davy
author_facet Elizabeth A. Dennis
Kerry L. Potter
Paul A. Estabrooks
Brenda M. Davy
author_sort Elizabeth A. Dennis
collection DOAJ
description The college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshman weight gain. One intervention provided opportunities to improve outcome expectations and self-efficacy within a social cognitive theory framework (SCT), while the other targeted the same variables but focused on explicit training in self-regulation skills (SCTSR). Methods. Freshmen (n=45) aged >18 years were randomized to a 14-week intervention, SCT or SCTSR; both included online modules and in-class meetings. Of the 45 students randomized, 5 withdrew before the classes began and 39 completed pre- and posttesting. Primary outcomes included body weight/composition, health behaviors, and program acceptability. Analyses included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and bivariate correlational analyses. Results. Body weight increased over the 14-week period, but there was no group difference. Percent body fat increased in SCTSR but not SCT (mean difference: SCTSR, +1.63 ± 0.52%; SCT, −0.25 ± 0.45%; P=0.01). Class attendance was 100% (SCTSR) and 98% (SCT); SCTSR students (>50%) remarked that the online tracking required “too much time.” Conclusions. The intervention was well received, although there were no improvements in weight outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-60d412edb31846778fef48e056620aad
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-60d412edb31846778fef48e056620aad2025-02-03T01:07:53ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162012-01-01201210.1155/2012/803769803769Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation TrainingElizabeth A. Dennis0Kerry L. Potter1Paul A. Estabrooks2Brenda M. Davy3Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 221 Wallace Hall (0430), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 221 Wallace Hall (0430), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 221 Wallace Hall (0430), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USADepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 221 Wallace Hall (0430), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USAThe college transition represents a critical period for maintaining a healthy weight, yet intervention participation and retention represent significant challenges. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of two interventions to prevent freshman weight gain. One intervention provided opportunities to improve outcome expectations and self-efficacy within a social cognitive theory framework (SCT), while the other targeted the same variables but focused on explicit training in self-regulation skills (SCTSR). Methods. Freshmen (n=45) aged >18 years were randomized to a 14-week intervention, SCT or SCTSR; both included online modules and in-class meetings. Of the 45 students randomized, 5 withdrew before the classes began and 39 completed pre- and posttesting. Primary outcomes included body weight/composition, health behaviors, and program acceptability. Analyses included independent sample t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and bivariate correlational analyses. Results. Body weight increased over the 14-week period, but there was no group difference. Percent body fat increased in SCTSR but not SCT (mean difference: SCTSR, +1.63 ± 0.52%; SCT, −0.25 ± 0.45%; P=0.01). Class attendance was 100% (SCTSR) and 98% (SCT); SCTSR students (>50%) remarked that the online tracking required “too much time.” Conclusions. The intervention was well received, although there were no improvements in weight outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769
spellingShingle Elizabeth A. Dennis
Kerry L. Potter
Paul A. Estabrooks
Brenda M. Davy
Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
Journal of Obesity
title Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_full Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_fullStr Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_full_unstemmed Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_short Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training
title_sort weight gain prevention for college freshmen comparing two social cognitive theory based interventions with and without explicit self regulation training
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/803769
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethadennis weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT kerrylpotter weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT paulaestabrooks weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining
AT brendamdavy weightgainpreventionforcollegefreshmencomparingtwosocialcognitivetheorybasedinterventionswithandwithoutexplicitselfregulationtraining