Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder that requires surgical intervention for treatment. Conjunctival autografts are preferred over simple excision due to lower recurrence rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the modified sutureless glue-free (MSGF) method with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal Aljahdali, Waleed Khayyat, Abdulelah T BinYamin, Sultan A Al-Qahtani, Mohammed D Alghamdi, Ali Saleh Alsudais, Husain A Alalgum, Halah Bin Helayel, Mohammed AlMutlak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-08-01
Series:BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/9/1/e001621.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832086929274830848
author Faisal Aljahdali
Waleed Khayyat
Abdulelah T BinYamin
Sultan A Al-Qahtani
Mohammed D Alghamdi
Ali Saleh Alsudais
Husain A Alalgum
Halah Bin Helayel
Mohammed AlMutlak
author_facet Faisal Aljahdali
Waleed Khayyat
Abdulelah T BinYamin
Sultan A Al-Qahtani
Mohammed D Alghamdi
Ali Saleh Alsudais
Husain A Alalgum
Halah Bin Helayel
Mohammed AlMutlak
author_sort Faisal Aljahdali
collection DOAJ
description Background Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder that requires surgical intervention for treatment. Conjunctival autografts are preferred over simple excision due to lower recurrence rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the modified sutureless glue-free (MSGF) method with conventional sutures (CS) for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MSGF and CS conjunctival autografts. Outcome measures included operation time, recurrence and postoperative complications. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.Results 11 RCTs involving 833 participants were included. The analysis revealed that MSGF had a significantly shorter operation time compared with CS (SMD −3.704, 95% CI −5.122 to −2.287, p<0.001). CS was associated with a higher risk of foreign body sensation (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.74, p=0.01). MSGF was associated with a higher risk of graft dehiscence (RR 9.01, 95% CI 2.74 to 29.68, p=0.000) and graft retraction (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.77, p=0.02). No significant differences were found in recurrence, graft haemorrhage, granuloma, Dellen and conjunctival oedema.Conclusion Using the MSGF technique in conjunctival autograft fixation for pterygium surgery reduces operation time by relying solely on the patient’s blood for fixation. However, it increases the risk of graft dehiscence and retraction. However, CS is linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing foreign body sensations. Understanding the learning curve and surgeon familiarity with novel techniques is crucial for optimising patient care and surgical outcomes, while individualised decision-making is necessary considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Further research is warranted to minimise complications and optimise surgical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-603c7a13061b4409abb2879aabbec35a
institution Kabale University
issn 2397-3269
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-603c7a13061b4409abb2879aabbec35a2025-02-06T09:10:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Ophthalmology2397-32692024-08-019110.1136/bmjophth-2023-001621Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisFaisal Aljahdali0Waleed Khayyat1Abdulelah T BinYamin2Sultan A Al-Qahtani3Mohammed D Alghamdi4Ali Saleh Alsudais5Husain A Alalgum6Halah Bin Helayel7Mohammed AlMutlak8King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of ophthalmology, Ohud hospital, Al Madinah, Saudi ArabiaCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaAnterior Segment Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaAnterior Segment Division, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaBackground Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder that requires surgical intervention for treatment. Conjunctival autografts are preferred over simple excision due to lower recurrence rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the modified sutureless glue-free (MSGF) method with conventional sutures (CS) for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery.Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MSGF and CS conjunctival autografts. Outcome measures included operation time, recurrence and postoperative complications. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.Results 11 RCTs involving 833 participants were included. The analysis revealed that MSGF had a significantly shorter operation time compared with CS (SMD −3.704, 95% CI −5.122 to −2.287, p<0.001). CS was associated with a higher risk of foreign body sensation (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.74, p=0.01). MSGF was associated with a higher risk of graft dehiscence (RR 9.01, 95% CI 2.74 to 29.68, p=0.000) and graft retraction (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.77, p=0.02). No significant differences were found in recurrence, graft haemorrhage, granuloma, Dellen and conjunctival oedema.Conclusion Using the MSGF technique in conjunctival autograft fixation for pterygium surgery reduces operation time by relying solely on the patient’s blood for fixation. However, it increases the risk of graft dehiscence and retraction. However, CS is linked to a higher likelihood of experiencing foreign body sensations. Understanding the learning curve and surgeon familiarity with novel techniques is crucial for optimising patient care and surgical outcomes, while individualised decision-making is necessary considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Further research is warranted to minimise complications and optimise surgical outcomes.https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/9/1/e001621.full
spellingShingle Faisal Aljahdali
Waleed Khayyat
Abdulelah T BinYamin
Sultan A Al-Qahtani
Mohammed D Alghamdi
Ali Saleh Alsudais
Husain A Alalgum
Halah Bin Helayel
Mohammed AlMutlak
Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
title Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort modified sutureless and glue free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/9/1/e001621.full
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalaljahdali modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT waleedkhayyat modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abdulelahtbinyamin modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sultanaalqahtani modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammeddalghamdi modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alisalehalsudais modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT husainaalalgum modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT halahbinhelayel modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammedalmutlak modifiedsuturelessandgluefreemethodversusconventionalsuturesforconjunctivalautograftfixationinprimarypterygiumsurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis