Synchronous citizen science with dogs

Abstract Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madeline H. Pelgrim, Zachary Tidd, Molly Byrne, Angie M. Johnston, Daphna Buchsbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-07-01
Series:Animal Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585495238934528
author Madeline H. Pelgrim
Zachary Tidd
Molly Byrne
Angie M. Johnston
Daphna Buchsbaum
author_facet Madeline H. Pelgrim
Zachary Tidd
Molly Byrne
Angie M. Johnston
Daphna Buchsbaum
author_sort Madeline H. Pelgrim
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs’ looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs’ guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f8ccfd9096f46d8865aa0b37e741e73
institution Kabale University
issn 1435-9456
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Animal Cognition
spelling doaj-art-5f8ccfd9096f46d8865aa0b37e741e732025-01-26T12:44:32ZengSpringerAnimal Cognition1435-94562024-07-0127111110.1007/s10071-024-01882-6Synchronous citizen science with dogsMadeline H. Pelgrim0Zachary Tidd1Molly Byrne2Angie M. Johnston3Daphna Buchsbaum4Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston CollegeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston CollegeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston CollegeDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown UniversityAbstract Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs’ looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs’ guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6Canine CognitionCitizen ScienceDomestic DogSocial CognitionDecision Making
spellingShingle Madeline H. Pelgrim
Zachary Tidd
Molly Byrne
Angie M. Johnston
Daphna Buchsbaum
Synchronous citizen science with dogs
Animal Cognition
Canine Cognition
Citizen Science
Domestic Dog
Social Cognition
Decision Making
title Synchronous citizen science with dogs
title_full Synchronous citizen science with dogs
title_fullStr Synchronous citizen science with dogs
title_full_unstemmed Synchronous citizen science with dogs
title_short Synchronous citizen science with dogs
title_sort synchronous citizen science with dogs
topic Canine Cognition
Citizen Science
Domestic Dog
Social Cognition
Decision Making
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01882-6
work_keys_str_mv AT madelinehpelgrim synchronouscitizensciencewithdogs
AT zacharytidd synchronouscitizensciencewithdogs
AT mollybyrne synchronouscitizensciencewithdogs
AT angiemjohnston synchronouscitizensciencewithdogs
AT daphnabuchsbaum synchronouscitizensciencewithdogs