Hemoglobin A1c to Detect Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Rural Population of Wardha District in India
Abstract Background: Global diabetes prevalence has doubled since 1980; India has the second-largest diabetic population. Nearly half of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cases go undiagnosed. This study assesses glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for diagnosing T2DM and prediabetes in at-risk individual...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Diabetology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_122_23 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Background: Global diabetes prevalence has doubled since 1980; India has the second-largest diabetic population. Nearly half of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cases go undiagnosed. This study assesses glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for diagnosing T2DM and prediabetes in at-risk individuals. Materials and Methods: We conducted a community-based cross-sectional study in a rural area. We assessed glucose intolerance risk factors among 1353 individuals (age >20 years), categorizing participants into low and moderate–high risk using the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS). For 363 participants with moderate- or high-T2DM risk, we evaluated fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin, and HbA1c. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) were constructed for HbA1c against gold standard fasting plasma glucose and 2-h-postload glucose to determine diagnostic accuracy and cut-point values for prediabetes and T2DM. We used decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess the utility of the new HbA1c cut point for T2DM diagnosis. Results: The prevalence of newly diagnosed T2DM and prediabetes was 44.63% (95% CI: 39.44–49.91) and 48.48% (95% CI: 43.24–53.76), respectively in people with moderate to high risk of T2DM on IDRS. On ROC, the area under the curve was 90.36% and 79.18%, respectively, reflecting high diagnostic accuracy. The optimum cut point of HbA1c for diagnosis of T2DM was 6.34%, with sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 94%, respectively. The HbA1c cut point for prediabetes was 5.65%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 75%, respectively. The new cut point of 6.34% on DCA gives substantial net benefit at a 40% probability risk, identifying 31 additional cases per 100 individuals at risk of T2DM and reducing the false positive by 47%. Conclusion: Our findings offer potential for developing a diagnostic protocol for T2DM and prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose) using HbA1c cut-point in people with moderate- to high-T2DM risk in rural settings. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2078-7685 |