Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System

Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron S. Case, MD, MHS, Chad H. Hochberg, MD, MHS, Binu Koirala, PhD, MGS, BSN, RN, Eleni Flanagan, DNP, MBA, Souvik Chatterjee, MD, William N. Checkley, MD, PhD, Ayse P. Gurses, PhD, MS, MPH, David N. Hager, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2025-01-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001201
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589699835756544
author Aaron S. Case, MD, MHS
Chad H. Hochberg, MD, MHS
Binu Koirala, PhD, MGS, BSN, RN
Eleni Flanagan, DNP, MBA
Souvik Chatterjee, MD
William N. Checkley, MD, PhD
Ayse P. Gurses, PhD, MS, MPH
David N. Hager, MD, PhD
author_facet Aaron S. Case, MD, MHS
Chad H. Hochberg, MD, MHS
Binu Koirala, PhD, MGS, BSN, RN
Eleni Flanagan, DNP, MBA
Souvik Chatterjee, MD
William N. Checkley, MD, PhD
Ayse P. Gurses, PhD, MS, MPH
David N. Hager, MD, PhD
author_sort Aaron S. Case, MD, MHS
collection DOAJ
description Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the organizational heterogeneity of IC within a five-hospital healthcare system. Surveys were completed by nurse managers from 12 (86%) of 14 IC settings. Six IC settings (50%) were embedded within acute care wards, four (33%) were stand-alone units, and two (17%) were embedded within an ICU. All had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:3, provided continuous cardiac telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry, high-flow nasal oxygen, and bedside intermittent hemodialysis. Most (> 50%) permitted arterial lines, frequent nursing assessments (every 2 hr), and noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. Vasopressors were less often permitted (< 25% of settings). Models of IC vary greatly within a single healthcare system.
format Article
id doaj-art-5e83342859e5429ea7425f3c9342d0df
institution Kabale University
issn 2639-8028
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Critical Care Explorations
spelling doaj-art-5e83342859e5429ea7425f3c9342d0df2025-01-24T09:19:28ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282025-01-0171e120110.1097/CCE.0000000000001201202501000-00013Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare SystemAaron S. Case, MD, MHS0Chad H. Hochberg, MD, MHS1Binu Koirala, PhD, MGS, BSN, RN2Eleni Flanagan, DNP, MBA3Souvik Chatterjee, MD4William N. Checkley, MD, PhD5Ayse P. Gurses, PhD, MS, MPH6David N. Hager, MD, PhD71 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.2 School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.3 Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.4 Armstrong Institute Center for Health Care Human Factors, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.Intermediate care (IC) is prevalent nationwide, but little is known about how to best organize this level of care. Using a 99-item cross-sectional survey assessing four domains (hospital and physical IC features, provider and nurse staffing, monitoring, and interventions/services), we describe the organizational heterogeneity of IC within a five-hospital healthcare system. Surveys were completed by nurse managers from 12 (86%) of 14 IC settings. Six IC settings (50%) were embedded within acute care wards, four (33%) were stand-alone units, and two (17%) were embedded within an ICU. All had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:3, provided continuous cardiac telemetry, continuous pulse oximetry, high-flow nasal oxygen, and bedside intermittent hemodialysis. Most (> 50%) permitted arterial lines, frequent nursing assessments (every 2 hr), and noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation via a tracheostomy. Vasopressors were less often permitted (< 25% of settings). Models of IC vary greatly within a single healthcare system.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001201
spellingShingle Aaron S. Case, MD, MHS
Chad H. Hochberg, MD, MHS
Binu Koirala, PhD, MGS, BSN, RN
Eleni Flanagan, DNP, MBA
Souvik Chatterjee, MD
William N. Checkley, MD, PhD
Ayse P. Gurses, PhD, MS, MPH
David N. Hager, MD, PhD
Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
Critical Care Explorations
title Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
title_full Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
title_fullStr Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
title_short Heterogeneity of Intermediate Care Organization Within a Single Healthcare System
title_sort heterogeneity of intermediate care organization within a single healthcare system
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001201
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronscasemdmhs heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT chadhhochbergmdmhs heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT binukoiralaphdmgsbsnrn heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT eleniflanagandnpmba heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT souvikchatterjeemd heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT williamncheckleymdphd heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT aysepgursesphdmsmph heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem
AT davidnhagermdphd heterogeneityofintermediatecareorganizationwithinasinglehealthcaresystem