The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation

Non-Darcy flow is observed in the shale gas reservoir because it is rich in organic nanopores. Generally, the permeability of shale gas reservoirs is modified because of non-Darcy flow. However, the viscosity is much less concerned. It has been verified that the viscosity of dilute gas depends on th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dongchen Liu, Xiaofan Chen, Na Jia, Zhimin Du, Yong Tang, Ping Yue, Yongyi Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2515152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550417240686592
author Dongchen Liu
Xiaofan Chen
Na Jia
Zhimin Du
Yong Tang
Ping Yue
Yongyi Zhou
author_facet Dongchen Liu
Xiaofan Chen
Na Jia
Zhimin Du
Yong Tang
Ping Yue
Yongyi Zhou
author_sort Dongchen Liu
collection DOAJ
description Non-Darcy flow is observed in the shale gas reservoir because it is rich in organic nanopores. Generally, the permeability of shale gas reservoirs is modified because of non-Darcy flow. However, the viscosity is much less concerned. It has been verified that the viscosity of dilute gas depends on the size of the pore. In this paper, the viscosity of methane in organic slit nanopore is determined with equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulation. The result shows that the viscosity of bulk methane would decrease with dropping down pressure, while the confined effect would make the viscosity of methane in the organic slit nanopore lesser than that of the bulk phase, and it decreases severely at low pressure. The confined dense gas viscosity model is obtained by theoretical derivation. The EMD results were fitted with this model to obtain the viscosity correction method for dense methane in organic slit nanopores. The dimensionless viscosity (μeff/μb) would decrease sharply with the Knudsen number between 0.1 and 10. Unlike the confined effect on the dilute gas, the potential contribution of the dense gas and the wall also affects its viscosity. Because of the confined effect on the dense methane, the flow capacity of methane is enhanced 1.5 times at least with the pore being smaller than 10 nm and the pressure being lower than 5 MPa. It means that keeping a low reservoir pressure helps to improve the flow of shale gas. This work can improve the understanding of the importance of gas viscosity with the non-Darcy flow in shale gas reservoirs.
format Article
id doaj-art-5e4cf5f7c69644c3a56389b4ad519c8a
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-5e4cf5f7c69644c3a56389b4ad519c8a2025-02-03T06:06:53ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81232022-01-01202210.1155/2022/2515152The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic SimulationDongchen Liu0Xiaofan Chen1Na Jia2Zhimin Du3Yong Tang4Ping Yue5Yongyi Zhou6State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationState Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationFaculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceState Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationState Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationState Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and ExploitationNorth China BranchNon-Darcy flow is observed in the shale gas reservoir because it is rich in organic nanopores. Generally, the permeability of shale gas reservoirs is modified because of non-Darcy flow. However, the viscosity is much less concerned. It has been verified that the viscosity of dilute gas depends on the size of the pore. In this paper, the viscosity of methane in organic slit nanopore is determined with equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) simulation. The result shows that the viscosity of bulk methane would decrease with dropping down pressure, while the confined effect would make the viscosity of methane in the organic slit nanopore lesser than that of the bulk phase, and it decreases severely at low pressure. The confined dense gas viscosity model is obtained by theoretical derivation. The EMD results were fitted with this model to obtain the viscosity correction method for dense methane in organic slit nanopores. The dimensionless viscosity (μeff/μb) would decrease sharply with the Knudsen number between 0.1 and 10. Unlike the confined effect on the dilute gas, the potential contribution of the dense gas and the wall also affects its viscosity. Because of the confined effect on the dense methane, the flow capacity of methane is enhanced 1.5 times at least with the pore being smaller than 10 nm and the pressure being lower than 5 MPa. It means that keeping a low reservoir pressure helps to improve the flow of shale gas. This work can improve the understanding of the importance of gas viscosity with the non-Darcy flow in shale gas reservoirs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2515152
spellingShingle Dongchen Liu
Xiaofan Chen
Na Jia
Zhimin Du
Yong Tang
Ping Yue
Yongyi Zhou
The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
Geofluids
title The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
title_full The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
title_fullStr The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
title_full_unstemmed The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
title_short The Viscosity of Methane in Organic Slit Nanopore of Gas-Bearing Shale by Molecular Dynamic Simulation
title_sort viscosity of methane in organic slit nanopore of gas bearing shale by molecular dynamic simulation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2515152
work_keys_str_mv AT dongchenliu theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT xiaofanchen theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT najia theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT zhimindu theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT yongtang theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT pingyue theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT yongyizhou theviscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT dongchenliu viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT xiaofanchen viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT najia viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT zhimindu viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT yongtang viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT pingyue viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation
AT yongyizhou viscosityofmethaneinorganicslitnanoporeofgasbearingshalebymoleculardynamicsimulation