Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China
Power engineering is complex, involving many participants, numerous management factors, and different stages. To improve the quality management level of power engineering and realize the standardization of power engineering quality management, power engineering construction quality management standa...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6129713 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832545920528416768 |
|---|---|
| author | Tai-Ping Yuan Jing-Feng Ou Juan Wang Wei Zhang |
| author_facet | Tai-Ping Yuan Jing-Feng Ou Juan Wang Wei Zhang |
| author_sort | Tai-Ping Yuan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Power engineering is complex, involving many participants, numerous management factors, and different stages. To improve the quality management level of power engineering and realize the standardization of power engineering quality management, power engineering construction quality management standardization (CQMS) is evaluated using the order relation analysis method (G1 method) and the cloud model method. Firstly, based on systematic thinking and practice in China, the CQMS framework is proposed, and the evaluation index system including organizational performance, management behaviour performance, and entity performance related to power engineering construction quality is established. Subsequently, the G1 method is used to determine the weight of each index, and the cloud model method is used to implement the evaluation process. The results are divided into five grades, representing the five grades of construction quality management. Finally, taking a practical multiterminal DC demonstration project in China as an example, the CQMS performance is described and evaluated. The evaluation results directly reflect the level and difference of CQMS and show that this evaluation method can provide a reference for CQMS in power engineering. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5dc8fec790034d46a7a6eeafe6af8f9f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8094 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Advances in Civil Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-5dc8fec790034d46a7a6eeafe6af8f9f2025-02-03T07:24:18ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6129713Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in ChinaTai-Ping Yuan0Jing-Feng Ou1Juan Wang2Wei Zhang3Academic of China Southern Power GridGuangdong Chengyu Construction Consultant CompanySchool of Civil and Hydraulic EngineeringSchool of Civil and Hydraulic EngineeringPower engineering is complex, involving many participants, numerous management factors, and different stages. To improve the quality management level of power engineering and realize the standardization of power engineering quality management, power engineering construction quality management standardization (CQMS) is evaluated using the order relation analysis method (G1 method) and the cloud model method. Firstly, based on systematic thinking and practice in China, the CQMS framework is proposed, and the evaluation index system including organizational performance, management behaviour performance, and entity performance related to power engineering construction quality is established. Subsequently, the G1 method is used to determine the weight of each index, and the cloud model method is used to implement the evaluation process. The results are divided into five grades, representing the five grades of construction quality management. Finally, taking a practical multiterminal DC demonstration project in China as an example, the CQMS performance is described and evaluated. The evaluation results directly reflect the level and difference of CQMS and show that this evaluation method can provide a reference for CQMS in power engineering.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6129713 |
| spellingShingle | Tai-Ping Yuan Jing-Feng Ou Juan Wang Wei Zhang Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China Advances in Civil Engineering |
| title | Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China |
| title_full | Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China |
| title_fullStr | Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China |
| title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China |
| title_short | Systematic Thinking and Evaluation of Construction Quality Management Standardization of Power Engineering in China |
| title_sort | systematic thinking and evaluation of construction quality management standardization of power engineering in china |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6129713 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taipingyuan systematicthinkingandevaluationofconstructionqualitymanagementstandardizationofpowerengineeringinchina AT jingfengou systematicthinkingandevaluationofconstructionqualitymanagementstandardizationofpowerengineeringinchina AT juanwang systematicthinkingandevaluationofconstructionqualitymanagementstandardizationofpowerengineeringinchina AT weizhang systematicthinkingandevaluationofconstructionqualitymanagementstandardizationofpowerengineeringinchina |