Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?

Abstract High prices for the emission of climate-damaging greenhouse gases are an efficient way to achieve the shift to a sustainable growth model and chosen climate targets. Despite the introduction of CO2 prices for emissions in Germany and Europe, large sectors are not yet covered by CO2 pricing....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Löschel, David Schulze
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Sciendo 2022-06-01
Series:Wirtschaftsdienst
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3172-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569525193670656
author Andreas Löschel
David Schulze
author_facet Andreas Löschel
David Schulze
author_sort Andreas Löschel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract High prices for the emission of climate-damaging greenhouse gases are an efficient way to achieve the shift to a sustainable growth model and chosen climate targets. Despite the introduction of CO2 prices for emissions in Germany and Europe, large sectors are not yet covered by CO2 pricing. In addition, the prices are most likely too low to sufficiently reflect climate damages or to ensure the achievement of the climate targets. Against this background, the introduction of a shadow price on emissions from public procurement and investments is another mechanism that can support the energy transition and may also make indirect emission savings financially attractive. The expected effect is limited by the low price range, the short planning horizon and the current limited application to federal expenditures. Potential hurdles include the legal complexity and the effort required to avoid double burdens should the scope of shadow pricing be extended to state and municipal levels. For financially weak public budgets, a shadow price means an additional burden. They can therefore only be a transitional solution until the introduction of a comprehensive price on greenhouse gas emissions.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d600b8784f24c69a4870a8b7e661ad1
institution Kabale University
issn 1613-978X
language deu
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Wirtschaftsdienst
spelling doaj-art-5d600b8784f24c69a4870a8b7e661ad12025-02-02T20:57:13ZdeuSciendoWirtschaftsdienst1613-978X2022-06-01102S1414610.1007/s10273-022-3172-xDo We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?Andreas Löschel0David Schulze1LS Umwelt-/Ressourcenökonomik und Nachhaltigkeit, Ruhr-Universität BochumLS Umwelt-/Ressourcenökonomik und Nachhaltigkeit, Ruhr-Universität BochumAbstract High prices for the emission of climate-damaging greenhouse gases are an efficient way to achieve the shift to a sustainable growth model and chosen climate targets. Despite the introduction of CO2 prices for emissions in Germany and Europe, large sectors are not yet covered by CO2 pricing. In addition, the prices are most likely too low to sufficiently reflect climate damages or to ensure the achievement of the climate targets. Against this background, the introduction of a shadow price on emissions from public procurement and investments is another mechanism that can support the energy transition and may also make indirect emission savings financially attractive. The expected effect is limited by the low price range, the short planning horizon and the current limited application to federal expenditures. Potential hurdles include the legal complexity and the effort required to avoid double burdens should the scope of shadow pricing be extended to state and municipal levels. For financially weak public budgets, a shadow price means an additional burden. They can therefore only be a transitional solution until the introduction of a comprehensive price on greenhouse gas emissions.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3172-x
spellingShingle Andreas Löschel
David Schulze
Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
Wirtschaftsdienst
title Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
title_full Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
title_fullStr Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
title_full_unstemmed Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
title_short Do We Need CO2 Shadow Prices on Public Expenditures?
title_sort do we need co2 shadow prices on public expenditures
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3172-x
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasloschel doweneedco2shadowpricesonpublicexpenditures
AT davidschulze doweneedco2shadowpricesonpublicexpenditures