Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation

Background. Preservation of the entire genetic diversity of the world’s flora is indispensable to the deployment of breeding practice aimed at development and improvement of the existing economically useful plant species and varieties. The in situ conservation approach is recognized as the topmost p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L. Yu. Shipilina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources 2020-01-01
Series:Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elpub.vir.nw.ru/jour/article/view/453
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545027415343104
author L. Yu. Shipilina
author_facet L. Yu. Shipilina
author_sort L. Yu. Shipilina
collection DOAJ
description Background. Preservation of the entire genetic diversity of the world’s flora is indispensable to the deployment of breeding practice aimed at development and improvement of the existing economically useful plant species and varieties. The in situ conservation approach is recognized as the topmost priority. Therefore, a study of crop wild relatives (CWR) in Kaliningrad Province appears vital to identify the most vulnerable species and enhance their in situ conservation.Materials and methods. Crop wild relatives occurring in Kaliningrad Province were the research target. The WIR and LE herbarium collections, published data, and results of VIR’s plant explorations undertaken in 1974 and 1983 served as the material for the research. Plant species included in the Red Data Books of Kaliningrad Province, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, etc. were analyzed, and the data from open databases (GBIF, CWR, ILDIS, etc.) and AgroAtlas maps were employed. CWR requiring special conservation measures were identified.Results and conclusions. Kaliningrad Province, Russia, is home to 324 species of CWR. Natural habitats of the 6 most vulnerable plant species were mapped: Vicia dumetorum L., Trifolium rubens L., Chrisaspis spadiceum L., Elytrigia juncea (L.) Nevski, Phleum phleoides (L.) H. Karst., and Allium vineale L. These species fall under the 1st vulnerability category.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ceca765c5b747f38529d0cf4c65da74
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-8834
2619-0982
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources
record_format Article
series Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции
spelling doaj-art-5ceca765c5b747f38529d0cf4c65da742025-02-03T08:31:12ZengN.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic ResourcesТруды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции2227-88342619-09822020-01-011804324310.30901/2227-8834-2019-4-32-43387Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservationL. Yu. Shipilina0N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic ResourcesBackground. Preservation of the entire genetic diversity of the world’s flora is indispensable to the deployment of breeding practice aimed at development and improvement of the existing economically useful plant species and varieties. The in situ conservation approach is recognized as the topmost priority. Therefore, a study of crop wild relatives (CWR) in Kaliningrad Province appears vital to identify the most vulnerable species and enhance their in situ conservation.Materials and methods. Crop wild relatives occurring in Kaliningrad Province were the research target. The WIR and LE herbarium collections, published data, and results of VIR’s plant explorations undertaken in 1974 and 1983 served as the material for the research. Plant species included in the Red Data Books of Kaliningrad Province, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, etc. were analyzed, and the data from open databases (GBIF, CWR, ILDIS, etc.) and AgroAtlas maps were employed. CWR requiring special conservation measures were identified.Results and conclusions. Kaliningrad Province, Russia, is home to 324 species of CWR. Natural habitats of the 6 most vulnerable plant species were mapped: Vicia dumetorum L., Trifolium rubens L., Chrisaspis spadiceum L., Elytrigia juncea (L.) Nevski, Phleum phleoides (L.) H. Karst., and Allium vineale L. These species fall under the 1st vulnerability category.https://elpub.vir.nw.ru/jour/article/view/453red data bookreservesplant genetic resourcesspecially protected natural areas
spellingShingle L. Yu. Shipilina
Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции
red data book
reserves
plant genetic resources
specially protected natural areas
title Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
title_full Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
title_fullStr Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
title_full_unstemmed Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
title_short Crop wild relatives of Kaliningrad Province recommended for in situ conservation
title_sort crop wild relatives of kaliningrad province recommended for in situ conservation
topic red data book
reserves
plant genetic resources
specially protected natural areas
url https://elpub.vir.nw.ru/jour/article/view/453
work_keys_str_mv AT lyushipilina cropwildrelativesofkaliningradprovincerecommendedforinsituconservation