FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT
Track infrastructure plays an important role in the railway business, where the safety of rail travel is determined by the integrity that exists in each component of the railway track. In this paper, an integrity assessment of track infrastructure is carried out using the Failure Modes and Effects A...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Brawijaya
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Rekayasa Mesin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rekayasamesin.ub.ac.id/index.php/rm/article/view/1855 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832592860972580864 |
---|---|
author | Angga Ahmad Maulana IGN Wiratmaja Puja Satrio Wicaksono |
author_facet | Angga Ahmad Maulana IGN Wiratmaja Puja Satrio Wicaksono |
author_sort | Angga Ahmad Maulana |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Track infrastructure plays an important role in the railway business, where the safety of rail travel is determined by the integrity that exists in each component of the railway track. In this paper, an integrity assessment of track infrastructure is carried out using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method by identifying various failure modes for each component and track geometry that have existed in the field. Then a survey was conducted to track maintenance experts at PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) to get the value of severity, occurrence, detection, and recommended actions taken. Based on the analysis, the failure mode with the highest Risk Priority Number (RPN) is the cracked rail on the welding/fish plate joint with a value of 280, while the failure mode with the lowest RPN is the loose rail with a value of 108. Then 21 failure modes fall into the "unacceptable" risk level, 4 failure modes fall into the "tolerable" risk level, and 1 failure mode falls into the "acceptable" risk level. From the results of this assessment, it is expected to help in prioritizing the risk of failure, so that the maintenance strategy can be planned properly, and the safety of train travel can be maintained. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5c75f78d4388477984aff9ffbe529ecb |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2338-1663 2477-6041 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | University of Brawijaya |
record_format | Article |
series | Rekayasa Mesin |
spelling | doaj-art-5c75f78d4388477984aff9ffbe529ecb2025-01-21T01:57:48ZengUniversity of BrawijayaRekayasa Mesin2338-16632477-60412024-12-011531665167910.21776/jrm.v15i3.18551566FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTAngga Ahmad Maulana0IGN Wiratmaja PujaSatrio WicaksonoInstitut Teknologi BandungTrack infrastructure plays an important role in the railway business, where the safety of rail travel is determined by the integrity that exists in each component of the railway track. In this paper, an integrity assessment of track infrastructure is carried out using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method by identifying various failure modes for each component and track geometry that have existed in the field. Then a survey was conducted to track maintenance experts at PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) to get the value of severity, occurrence, detection, and recommended actions taken. Based on the analysis, the failure mode with the highest Risk Priority Number (RPN) is the cracked rail on the welding/fish plate joint with a value of 280, while the failure mode with the lowest RPN is the loose rail with a value of 108. Then 21 failure modes fall into the "unacceptable" risk level, 4 failure modes fall into the "tolerable" risk level, and 1 failure mode falls into the "acceptable" risk level. From the results of this assessment, it is expected to help in prioritizing the risk of failure, so that the maintenance strategy can be planned properly, and the safety of train travel can be maintained.https://rekayasamesin.ub.ac.id/index.php/rm/article/view/1855fmeatrack infrastructuresafetyintegrity assessmentmaintenance strategy |
spellingShingle | Angga Ahmad Maulana IGN Wiratmaja Puja Satrio Wicaksono FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT Rekayasa Mesin fmea track infrastructure safety integrity assessment maintenance strategy |
title | FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT |
title_full | FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT |
title_fullStr | FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT |
title_full_unstemmed | FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT |
title_short | FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) ON TRACK INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT |
title_sort | failure modes and effects analysis fmea on track infrastructure integrity assessment |
topic | fmea track infrastructure safety integrity assessment maintenance strategy |
url | https://rekayasamesin.ub.ac.id/index.php/rm/article/view/1855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anggaahmadmaulana failuremodesandeffectsanalysisfmeaontrackinfrastructureintegrityassessment AT ignwiratmajapuja failuremodesandeffectsanalysisfmeaontrackinfrastructureintegrityassessment AT satriowicaksono failuremodesandeffectsanalysisfmeaontrackinfrastructureintegrityassessment |