The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.

Several interventional strategies have been implemented in malaria endemic areas where the burden is high, that include among others, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), a tactic that blocks transmission and can reduce disease morbidity. However, the implementation IPT strategies raises a genui...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric Lyimo, Geofrey Makenga, Louise Turner, Thomas Lavstsen, John P A Lusingu, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Daniel T R Minja, Christian W Wang, Vito Baraka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316482
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540182137536512
author Eric Lyimo
Geofrey Makenga
Louise Turner
Thomas Lavstsen
John P A Lusingu
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Daniel T R Minja
Christian W Wang
Vito Baraka
author_facet Eric Lyimo
Geofrey Makenga
Louise Turner
Thomas Lavstsen
John P A Lusingu
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Daniel T R Minja
Christian W Wang
Vito Baraka
author_sort Eric Lyimo
collection DOAJ
description Several interventional strategies have been implemented in malaria endemic areas where the burden is high, that include among others, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), a tactic that blocks transmission and can reduce disease morbidity. However, the implementation IPT strategies raises a genuine concern, intervening the development of naturally acquired immunity to malaria which requires continuous contact with parasite antigens. This study investigated whether dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc) impairs IgG reactivity to six malaria antigens. An IPTsc trial in north-eastern Tanzania administered three doses of DP or ASAQ at four-monthly intervals and the schoolchildren were followed up. This study compared IgG reactivity against GLURP-R2, MSP1, MSP3, and CIDR domains (CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4, and CIDRa1.5) of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP-1) in intervention and control groups using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. During the study, 369 schoolchildren were available for analysis, 119, 134 and 116 participants in the control, DP and ASAQ groups, respectively. Breadth of malaria antigen recognition increased significantly during and after the intervention phases and did not differ between the study groups (Trend test: DP, z-score = 5.92, p < 0.001, ASAQ, z-score = 6.64, p < 0.001 and control, z-score = 5.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the control and ASAQ group in the recognition of any of the tested antigens at all visits. In the DP group, however, during the intervention period IPTsc did not impair antibody against MSP1, MSP3, CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4 and CIDRa1.5, but it did impair against GLURP-R2. The current study has shown that effective IPTsc with DP or ASAQ does not interfere with the development of antibodies against malaria antigens of the blood stages, suggesting that the advancement of naturally acquired immunity to malaria is not impeded by IPTsc interventions.
format Article
id doaj-art-5c6352269d0141b98672c10a49ebb796
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-5c6352269d0141b98672c10a49ebb7962025-02-05T05:31:45ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031648210.1371/journal.pone.0316482The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.Eric LyimoGeofrey MakengaLouise TurnerThomas LavstsenJohn P A LusinguJean-Pierre Van GeertruydenDaniel T R MinjaChristian W WangVito BarakaSeveral interventional strategies have been implemented in malaria endemic areas where the burden is high, that include among others, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), a tactic that blocks transmission and can reduce disease morbidity. However, the implementation IPT strategies raises a genuine concern, intervening the development of naturally acquired immunity to malaria which requires continuous contact with parasite antigens. This study investigated whether dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) or artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) IPT in schoolchildren (IPTsc) impairs IgG reactivity to six malaria antigens. An IPTsc trial in north-eastern Tanzania administered three doses of DP or ASAQ at four-monthly intervals and the schoolchildren were followed up. This study compared IgG reactivity against GLURP-R2, MSP1, MSP3, and CIDR domains (CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4, and CIDRa1.5) of Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP-1) in intervention and control groups using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. During the study, 369 schoolchildren were available for analysis, 119, 134 and 116 participants in the control, DP and ASAQ groups, respectively. Breadth of malaria antigen recognition increased significantly during and after the intervention phases and did not differ between the study groups (Trend test: DP, z-score = 5.92, p < 0.001, ASAQ, z-score = 6.64, p < 0.001 and control, z-score = 5.85, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the control and ASAQ group in the recognition of any of the tested antigens at all visits. In the DP group, however, during the intervention period IPTsc did not impair antibody against MSP1, MSP3, CIDRa1.1, CIDRa1.4 and CIDRa1.5, but it did impair against GLURP-R2. The current study has shown that effective IPTsc with DP or ASAQ does not interfere with the development of antibodies against malaria antigens of the blood stages, suggesting that the advancement of naturally acquired immunity to malaria is not impeded by IPTsc interventions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316482
spellingShingle Eric Lyimo
Geofrey Makenga
Louise Turner
Thomas Lavstsen
John P A Lusingu
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Daniel T R Minja
Christian W Wang
Vito Baraka
The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
PLoS ONE
title The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
title_full The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
title_fullStr The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
title_short The impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on IgG response against six blood stage Plasmodium falciparum antigens.
title_sort impact of intermittent preventive treatment in school aged children with dihydroartemisinin piperaquine and artesunate amodiaquine on igg response against six blood stage plasmodium falciparum antigens
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316482
work_keys_str_mv AT ericlyimo theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT geofreymakenga theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT louiseturner theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT thomaslavstsen theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT johnpalusingu theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT jeanpierrevangeertruyden theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT danieltrminja theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT christianwwang theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT vitobaraka theimpactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT ericlyimo impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT geofreymakenga impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT louiseturner impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT thomaslavstsen impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT johnpalusingu impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT jeanpierrevangeertruyden impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT danieltrminja impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT christianwwang impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens
AT vitobaraka impactofintermittentpreventivetreatmentinschoolagedchildrenwithdihydroartemisininpiperaquineandartesunateamodiaquineoniggresponseagainstsixbloodstageplasmodiumfalciparumantigens