Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off
The genetic struggle between parents and their offspring is a fundamental aspect of kin selection theory and the gene-centered perspective of evolution. Parental resource conflict, or parent-offspring conflict, is an intriguing concept within evolutionary biology. It refers to the natural disagreeme...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Asian Journal of Medical Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4406 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575453775265792 |
|---|---|
| author | Ruby Dhar Arun Kumar Subhradip Karmakar |
| author_facet | Ruby Dhar Arun Kumar Subhradip Karmakar |
| author_sort | Ruby Dhar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The genetic struggle between parents and their offspring is a fundamental aspect of kin selection theory and the gene-centered perspective of evolution. Parental resource conflict, or parent-offspring conflict, is an intriguing concept within evolutionary biology. It refers to the natural disagreement between parents and their young regarding how parental resources should be distributed. This disagreement emerges from the differing evolutionary goals of parents for their offspring.
Conflict arises only if parental behavior is influenced by genetic trade-offs concerning offspring success and the parent’s capacity to nurture more offspring, and its manifestation is significantly influenced by the nature of these trade-offs. There is a hypothetical scenario in which parents can influence gene expression in embryos directly. Similar to genomic imprinting, this may happen as a result of sexual selection in males competing with other males to gain more resources for their offspring from their mothers. One significant evolutionary theory that sheds light on parent-offspring resource conflict is parental investment theory, introduced by Robert Trivers in 1972. This theory posits that to enhance the survival prospects of their young, parents need to dedicate resources (such as time, energy, food, and care) to their offspring. However, given that resources are finite, parents must determine the amount of their available resources to distribute among each child or prospective child as well as who will contribute what. Mothers and fathers possess distinct reproductive priorities. Females generally put more effort into raising their young due to biological reasons (such as gestation and breastfeeding). Conversely, males may encounter different advantages and disadvantages regarding their contribution to offspring, which could result in conflicts over how resources ought to be allocated between parents and their young. Males and females employ distinct strategies to enhance their reproductive success, leading to competition over how resources are distributed to offspring. These strategies are influenced by sexual selection.
To sum up, the competition for resources between parents, viewed through the lens of evolution, arises from the differing reproductive goals of parents and their offspring, fuelled by the fight for scarce resources. This interaction has molded the strategies and behaviors that affect resource distribution within families, applicable to both humans and other species. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5c453cc9909948d8b5b1ca87754f85f0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2467-9100 2091-0576 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Asian Journal of Medical Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-5c453cc9909948d8b5b1ca87754f85f02025-02-01T06:57:01ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762025-02-0116212https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i2.4406Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-offRuby Dhar 0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-6554Arun Kumar 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8800-0296Subhradip Karmakar 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-8729Scientist, Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India Additional Professor, Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India The genetic struggle between parents and their offspring is a fundamental aspect of kin selection theory and the gene-centered perspective of evolution. Parental resource conflict, or parent-offspring conflict, is an intriguing concept within evolutionary biology. It refers to the natural disagreement between parents and their young regarding how parental resources should be distributed. This disagreement emerges from the differing evolutionary goals of parents for their offspring. Conflict arises only if parental behavior is influenced by genetic trade-offs concerning offspring success and the parent’s capacity to nurture more offspring, and its manifestation is significantly influenced by the nature of these trade-offs. There is a hypothetical scenario in which parents can influence gene expression in embryos directly. Similar to genomic imprinting, this may happen as a result of sexual selection in males competing with other males to gain more resources for their offspring from their mothers. One significant evolutionary theory that sheds light on parent-offspring resource conflict is parental investment theory, introduced by Robert Trivers in 1972. This theory posits that to enhance the survival prospects of their young, parents need to dedicate resources (such as time, energy, food, and care) to their offspring. However, given that resources are finite, parents must determine the amount of their available resources to distribute among each child or prospective child as well as who will contribute what. Mothers and fathers possess distinct reproductive priorities. Females generally put more effort into raising their young due to biological reasons (such as gestation and breastfeeding). Conversely, males may encounter different advantages and disadvantages regarding their contribution to offspring, which could result in conflicts over how resources ought to be allocated between parents and their young. Males and females employ distinct strategies to enhance their reproductive success, leading to competition over how resources are distributed to offspring. These strategies are influenced by sexual selection. To sum up, the competition for resources between parents, viewed through the lens of evolution, arises from the differing reproductive goals of parents and their offspring, fuelled by the fight for scarce resources. This interaction has molded the strategies and behaviors that affect resource distribution within families, applicable to both humans and other species.https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4406evolution; parental conflict; resource sharing; offspring priority; sexual reproduction |
| spellingShingle | Ruby Dhar Arun Kumar Subhradip Karmakar Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off Asian Journal of Medical Sciences evolution; parental conflict; resource sharing; offspring priority; sexual reproduction |
| title | Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off |
| title_full | Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off |
| title_fullStr | Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off |
| title_full_unstemmed | Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off |
| title_short | Parental conflicts and resource sharing: Evolutionary trade-off |
| title_sort | parental conflicts and resource sharing evolutionary trade off |
| topic | evolution; parental conflict; resource sharing; offspring priority; sexual reproduction |
| url | https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4406 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rubydhar parentalconflictsandresourcesharingevolutionarytradeoff AT arunkumar parentalconflictsandresourcesharingevolutionarytradeoff AT subhradipkarmakar parentalconflictsandresourcesharingevolutionarytradeoff |