Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation
For decades, systems in the mobility sector have been maintained as discrete entities. It is imperative that they collaborate in order to enhance traffic safety and efficiency, while simultaneously reducing environmental pollution. The protocols employed in the formally separated ecosystems demonstr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10845830/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832540458958454784 |
|---|---|
| author | Jonas Vogt Hans D. Schotten Horst Wieker |
| author_facet | Jonas Vogt Hans D. Schotten Horst Wieker |
| author_sort | Jonas Vogt |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For decades, systems in the mobility sector have been maintained as discrete entities. It is imperative that they collaborate in order to enhance traffic safety and efficiency, while simultaneously reducing environmental pollution. The protocols employed in the formally separated ecosystems demonstrate disparate behaviors and data representations. In order to facilitate connectivity between these ecosystems, we propose the introduction of the Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation (ITS-PIE). The evaluation method allows system architects and developers to analyze existing protocols in a six-step process. The initial step is the assessment of interdependencies, which identifies any formal or informal correlation between two protocol specifications. The second step is the formal classification of the protocols’ informal and formal descriptions, which emphasizes the specification’s similarities and differences. The formal comparison calculates the consensual parallelisms between the formal specifications. The data evaluation defines tooling to describe the specifications in a way that an automated transition can be conducted. The protocols’ architecture context evaluation displays the framework conditions. The final step is a situation-dependent interpretation. Two illustrative examples are provided herein to illustrate the advantages of the evaluation and to highlight the principal challenges that arise during the process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5b52fd2e7db846ab88b3cb46fa10db3b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2687-7813 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems |
| spelling | doaj-art-5b52fd2e7db846ab88b3cb46fa10db3b2025-02-05T00:01:22ZengIEEEIEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems2687-78132025-01-016679410.1109/OJITS.2025.353154910845830Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability EvaluationJonas Vogt0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-0460Hans D. Schotten1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-3635Horst Wieker2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6081-4098Institute for Wireless Communication and Navigation (WICON), University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyInstitute for Wireless Communication and Navigation (WICON), University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyITS Research Group (FGVT), University of Applied Science Saarland - htw saar, Saarbrücken, GermanyFor decades, systems in the mobility sector have been maintained as discrete entities. It is imperative that they collaborate in order to enhance traffic safety and efficiency, while simultaneously reducing environmental pollution. The protocols employed in the formally separated ecosystems demonstrate disparate behaviors and data representations. In order to facilitate connectivity between these ecosystems, we propose the introduction of the Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation (ITS-PIE). The evaluation method allows system architects and developers to analyze existing protocols in a six-step process. The initial step is the assessment of interdependencies, which identifies any formal or informal correlation between two protocol specifications. The second step is the formal classification of the protocols’ informal and formal descriptions, which emphasizes the specification’s similarities and differences. The formal comparison calculates the consensual parallelisms between the formal specifications. The data evaluation defines tooling to describe the specifications in a way that an automated transition can be conducted. The protocols’ architecture context evaluation displays the framework conditions. The final step is a situation-dependent interpretation. Two illustrative examples are provided herein to illustrate the advantages of the evaluation and to highlight the principal challenges that arise during the process.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10845830/Cooperative connected and automated mobilityintelligent transportation systemsinteroperabilityprotocols |
| spellingShingle | Jonas Vogt Hans D. Schotten Horst Wieker Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Cooperative connected and automated mobility intelligent transportation systems interoperability protocols |
| title | Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation |
| title_full | Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation |
| title_short | Intelligent Transportation System Protocol Interoperability Evaluation |
| title_sort | intelligent transportation system protocol interoperability evaluation |
| topic | Cooperative connected and automated mobility intelligent transportation systems interoperability protocols |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10845830/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jonasvogt intelligenttransportationsystemprotocolinteroperabilityevaluation AT hansdschotten intelligenttransportationsystemprotocolinteroperabilityevaluation AT horstwieker intelligenttransportationsystemprotocolinteroperabilityevaluation |