Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration

Darcy-scale capillary pressure is traditionally assumed to be constant. By contrast, a considerable gap exists between the measured and equilibrium capillary pressures when the same moisture saturation is considered with a high flow rate, and this gap is called the dynamic effect on the capillary pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Zhih Tsai, Yu-Tung Liu, Yung-Li Wang, Liang-Cheng Chang, Shao-Yiu Hsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8946948
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564032655065088
author Yi-Zhih Tsai
Yu-Tung Liu
Yung-Li Wang
Liang-Cheng Chang
Shao-Yiu Hsu
author_facet Yi-Zhih Tsai
Yu-Tung Liu
Yung-Li Wang
Liang-Cheng Chang
Shao-Yiu Hsu
author_sort Yi-Zhih Tsai
collection DOAJ
description Darcy-scale capillary pressure is traditionally assumed to be constant. By contrast, a considerable gap exists between the measured and equilibrium capillary pressures when the same moisture saturation is considered with a high flow rate, and this gap is called the dynamic effect on the capillary pressure. In this study, downward infiltration experiments of sand columns are performed to measure cumulative infiltration and to calculate the wetting front depth and wetting front velocity in sands with different grain sizes. We estimate the equilibrium capillary pressure head or suction head at the wetting front using both the classical Green–Ampt (GAM) and modified Green–Ampt (MGAM) models. The results show that the performance of MGAM in simulating downward infiltration is superior to that of GAM. Moreover, because GAM neglects the dynamic effect, it systematically underestimates the equilibrium suction head in our experiments. We also find that the model parameters α^ and β of MGAM are affected by the grain size of sands and porosity, and the dynamic effect of the capillary pressure increases with decreasing grain size and increasing porosity.
format Article
id doaj-art-5b284e9963ed461f9bf04d4f570f8930
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8115
1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-5b284e9963ed461f9bf04d4f570f89302025-02-03T01:12:00ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81151468-81232018-01-01201810.1155/2018/89469488946948Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for InfiltrationYi-Zhih Tsai0Yu-Tung Liu1Yung-Li Wang2Liang-Cheng Chang3Shao-Yiu Hsu4Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanDepartment of Water Resources Engineering and Conservation, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, TaiwanDepartment of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30050, TaiwanDepartment of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanDarcy-scale capillary pressure is traditionally assumed to be constant. By contrast, a considerable gap exists between the measured and equilibrium capillary pressures when the same moisture saturation is considered with a high flow rate, and this gap is called the dynamic effect on the capillary pressure. In this study, downward infiltration experiments of sand columns are performed to measure cumulative infiltration and to calculate the wetting front depth and wetting front velocity in sands with different grain sizes. We estimate the equilibrium capillary pressure head or suction head at the wetting front using both the classical Green–Ampt (GAM) and modified Green–Ampt (MGAM) models. The results show that the performance of MGAM in simulating downward infiltration is superior to that of GAM. Moreover, because GAM neglects the dynamic effect, it systematically underestimates the equilibrium suction head in our experiments. We also find that the model parameters α^ and β of MGAM are affected by the grain size of sands and porosity, and the dynamic effect of the capillary pressure increases with decreasing grain size and increasing porosity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8946948
spellingShingle Yi-Zhih Tsai
Yu-Tung Liu
Yung-Li Wang
Liang-Cheng Chang
Shao-Yiu Hsu
Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
Geofluids
title Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
title_full Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
title_fullStr Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
title_short Effects of the Grain Size on Dynamic Capillary Pressure and the Modified Green–Ampt Model for Infiltration
title_sort effects of the grain size on dynamic capillary pressure and the modified green ampt model for infiltration
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8946948
work_keys_str_mv AT yizhihtsai effectsofthegrainsizeondynamiccapillarypressureandthemodifiedgreenamptmodelforinfiltration
AT yutungliu effectsofthegrainsizeondynamiccapillarypressureandthemodifiedgreenamptmodelforinfiltration
AT yungliwang effectsofthegrainsizeondynamiccapillarypressureandthemodifiedgreenamptmodelforinfiltration
AT liangchengchang effectsofthegrainsizeondynamiccapillarypressureandthemodifiedgreenamptmodelforinfiltration
AT shaoyiuhsu effectsofthegrainsizeondynamiccapillarypressureandthemodifiedgreenamptmodelforinfiltration