Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness

The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammed Khaise, Silvio de Barros, Ney Rohem, Maria Banea, Sandip Budhe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Gruppo Italiano Frattura 2022-12-01
Series:Fracture and Structural Integrity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://3.64.71.86/index.php/fis/article/view/3697
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544402580439040
author Muhammed Khaise
Silvio de Barros
Ney Rohem
Maria Banea
Sandip Budhe
author_facet Muhammed Khaise
Silvio de Barros
Ney Rohem
Maria Banea
Sandip Budhe
author_sort Muhammed Khaise
collection DOAJ
description The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code with constitutive models for metallic steel and composite material to failure modelling was used. Three different cases: non-defective pipe, wall loss defective pipe and composite repaired of defective pipe are considered. It was found that the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical results in all the three cases. The theoretical failure pressure determined by ISO/TS 24817 standard for wall loss defect pipe is highly conservative compared to the numerical failure pressure for the given composite repair thickness. Additionally, the numerical study on optimization of repair thickness revealed that lower composite repair thickness can also sustain the designed failure pressure (composite repair thickness of 8.4 mm can sustain the same designed pressure instead of 16.1 mm thickness), which implies there is scope to further reduce the composite thickness, which ultimately reduce the repair cost.
format Article
id doaj-art-5a43f163fae44350905d42828266cf29
institution Kabale University
issn 1971-8993
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Gruppo Italiano Frattura
record_format Article
series Fracture and Structural Integrity
spelling doaj-art-5a43f163fae44350905d42828266cf292025-02-03T10:27:34ZengGruppo Italiano FratturaFracture and Structural Integrity1971-89932022-12-011763Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thicknessMuhammed Khaise0Silvio de Barros1Ney Rohem2Maria Banea3Sandip Budhe4National Institute of Technology Calicut, 673601, IndiaCESI LINEACT, Saint-Nazaire, FranceInstituto Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilFederal Center of Technological Education (CEFET/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, 20271-110, BrazilNational Institute of Technology Calicut, 673601, India The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code with constitutive models for metallic steel and composite material to failure modelling was used. Three different cases: non-defective pipe, wall loss defective pipe and composite repaired of defective pipe are considered. It was found that the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical results in all the three cases. The theoretical failure pressure determined by ISO/TS 24817 standard for wall loss defect pipe is highly conservative compared to the numerical failure pressure for the given composite repair thickness. Additionally, the numerical study on optimization of repair thickness revealed that lower composite repair thickness can also sustain the designed failure pressure (composite repair thickness of 8.4 mm can sustain the same designed pressure instead of 16.1 mm thickness), which implies there is scope to further reduce the composite thickness, which ultimately reduce the repair cost. https://3.64.71.86/index.php/fis/article/view/3697Composite RepairNumerical modellingOptimisationComposite thicknessWall loss defectCorroded pipeline
spellingShingle Muhammed Khaise
Silvio de Barros
Ney Rohem
Maria Banea
Sandip Budhe
Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
Fracture and Structural Integrity
Composite Repair
Numerical modelling
Optimisation
Composite thickness
Wall loss defect
Corroded pipeline
title Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
title_full Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
title_fullStr Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
title_full_unstemmed Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
title_short Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
title_sort numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness
topic Composite Repair
Numerical modelling
Optimisation
Composite thickness
Wall loss defect
Corroded pipeline
url https://3.64.71.86/index.php/fis/article/view/3697
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammedkhaise numericalanalysisofrepairedwalllossdefectpipelinesforoptimumcompositewrapthickness
AT silviodebarros numericalanalysisofrepairedwalllossdefectpipelinesforoptimumcompositewrapthickness
AT neyrohem numericalanalysisofrepairedwalllossdefectpipelinesforoptimumcompositewrapthickness
AT mariabanea numericalanalysisofrepairedwalllossdefectpipelinesforoptimumcompositewrapthickness
AT sandipbudhe numericalanalysisofrepairedwalllossdefectpipelinesforoptimumcompositewrapthickness