Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation
This study addressed the violations of child support rights in the province of Pichincha, employing a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology based on the TODIM and PROMETHEE methods in conjunction with neutrosophic theory. The research aimed to identify critical failures in the child supp...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education,
2024-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journal-fea.com/article_209139_c96dc2991840b35272b5647560dabdd6.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832577811815071744 |
---|---|
author | Vanessa Lisseth Montenegro Altamirano Jaime Rodrigo Cadena Morillo Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita |
author_facet | Vanessa Lisseth Montenegro Altamirano Jaime Rodrigo Cadena Morillo Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita |
author_sort | Vanessa Lisseth Montenegro Altamirano |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study addressed the violations of child support rights in the province of Pichincha, employing a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology based on the TODIM and PROMETHEE methods in conjunction with neutrosophic theory. The research aimed to identify critical failures in the child support administration system within the study area. The investigation focused on the complexity of the violations, which require decision-making that considers multiple interrelated criteria. Five key violations were identified, including non-compliance with payment obligations and unilateral modification of agreements, which negatively affect the beneficiaries' well-being. Four main evaluation criteria were selected and assessed with the help of five experts. The applied methodology combined the TODIM and PROMETHEE multi-criteria methods to rank the violations according to their impact, utilizing neutrosophic theory to handle the uncertainty inherent in decision-making within this context. The results indicated that unilateral modification of agreements was the most critical violation, with significant effects on the beneficiaries' economic stability. The lack of access to financial information was also highlighted as a relevant issue. The combined use of these methods allowed for a more accurate evaluation of the violations, providing new approaches to improve the administration and protection of child support rights. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-57cf9cf113c744edb1b9135726420421 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2783-1442 2717-3453 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
publisher | Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education, |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications |
spelling | doaj-art-57cf9cf113c744edb1b91357264204212025-01-30T15:07:23ZengAyandegan Institute of Higher Education,Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications2783-14422717-34532024-11-015Special Issue516110.22105/jfea.2024.468209.1551209139Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluationVanessa Lisseth Montenegro Altamirano0Jaime Rodrigo Cadena Morillo1Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita2Regional Autonomous University of Los Andes, Tulcán, Ecuador.Regional Autonomous University of Los Andes, Tulcán, Ecuador.Regional Autonomous University of Los Andes, Tulcán, Ecuador.This study addressed the violations of child support rights in the province of Pichincha, employing a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology based on the TODIM and PROMETHEE methods in conjunction with neutrosophic theory. The research aimed to identify critical failures in the child support administration system within the study area. The investigation focused on the complexity of the violations, which require decision-making that considers multiple interrelated criteria. Five key violations were identified, including non-compliance with payment obligations and unilateral modification of agreements, which negatively affect the beneficiaries' well-being. Four main evaluation criteria were selected and assessed with the help of five experts. The applied methodology combined the TODIM and PROMETHEE multi-criteria methods to rank the violations according to their impact, utilizing neutrosophic theory to handle the uncertainty inherent in decision-making within this context. The results indicated that unilateral modification of agreements was the most critical violation, with significant effects on the beneficiaries' economic stability. The lack of access to financial information was also highlighted as a relevant issue. The combined use of these methods allowed for a more accurate evaluation of the violations, providing new approaches to improve the administration and protection of child support rights.https://www.journal-fea.com/article_209139_c96dc2991840b35272b5647560dabdd6.pdfneutrosophic settodimprometheechild supportrights violations |
spellingShingle | Vanessa Lisseth Montenegro Altamirano Jaime Rodrigo Cadena Morillo Carmen Marina Méndez Cabrita Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications neutrosophic set todim promethee child support rights violations |
title | Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation |
title_full | Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation |
title_fullStr | Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation |
title_short | Assessing alimony rights violations: a neutrosophic multi-criteria evaluation |
title_sort | assessing alimony rights violations a neutrosophic multi criteria evaluation |
topic | neutrosophic set todim promethee child support rights violations |
url | https://www.journal-fea.com/article_209139_c96dc2991840b35272b5647560dabdd6.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanessalissethmontenegroaltamirano assessingalimonyrightsviolationsaneutrosophicmulticriteriaevaluation AT jaimerodrigocadenamorillo assessingalimonyrightsviolationsaneutrosophicmulticriteriaevaluation AT carmenmarinamendezcabrita assessingalimonyrightsviolationsaneutrosophicmulticriteriaevaluation |