Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
Background: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regardi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Robert Koch Institute
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Health Monitoring |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFile |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832592284635365376 |
---|---|
author | Robyn Kettlitz Maike Buchmann Oktay Tuncer Laura Krause Thomas Ziese Lukas Reitzle |
author_facet | Robyn Kettlitz Maike Buchmann Oktay Tuncer Laura Krause Thomas Ziese Lukas Reitzle |
author_sort | Robyn Kettlitz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regarding the dissemination of results of surveillance for non-communicable diseases (NCD) was carried out. Methods: 13 semi-structured guided interviews were conducted with persons from health politics, healthcare, media and science and analysed in a qualitative content analysis (interview survey period: 10/2022 – 01/2023). Results: For all respondents, the frequency of diseases and their determinants, care and consequences were the focus of NCD surveillance. Wider determinants of health and illness situation were also considered relevant. Requirements regarding the presentation of these contents differed between the user groups. Factors that facilitate and inhibit the use of NCD surveillance information were consistent across the user groups. Conclusions: There is a need for the presentation of options for action, especially for users involved in health politics and healthcare. Diabetes surveillance showed that many requirements are already met by the existing formats. Many of the users also wanted the content to be expanded to include other NCD. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-57b81928dd32451fae7cf31707c95f7c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2511-2708 |
language | deu |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Robert Koch Institute |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Health Monitoring |
spelling | doaj-art-57b81928dd32451fae7cf31707c95f7c2025-01-21T11:52:57ZdeuRobert Koch InstituteJournal of Health Monitoring2511-27082024-12-019411110.25646/12919johm-9-4-06-e12919Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview studyRobyn Kettlitz0Maike Buchmann1Oktay Tuncer2Laura Krause3Thomas Ziese4Lukas Reitzle5Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Epidemiology, Braunschweig, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, GermanyBackground: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regarding the dissemination of results of surveillance for non-communicable diseases (NCD) was carried out. Methods: 13 semi-structured guided interviews were conducted with persons from health politics, healthcare, media and science and analysed in a qualitative content analysis (interview survey period: 10/2022 – 01/2023). Results: For all respondents, the frequency of diseases and their determinants, care and consequences were the focus of NCD surveillance. Wider determinants of health and illness situation were also considered relevant. Requirements regarding the presentation of these contents differed between the user groups. Factors that facilitate and inhibit the use of NCD surveillance information were consistent across the user groups. Conclusions: There is a need for the presentation of options for action, especially for users involved in health politics and healthcare. Diabetes surveillance showed that many requirements are already met by the existing formats. Many of the users also wanted the content to be expanded to include other NCD.https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFilencd surveillancediabetes surveillancequalitative interviewsinformation transferuser evaluation |
spellingShingle | Robyn Kettlitz Maike Buchmann Oktay Tuncer Laura Krause Thomas Ziese Lukas Reitzle Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study Journal of Health Monitoring ncd surveillance diabetes surveillance qualitative interviews information transfer user evaluation |
title | Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study |
title_full | Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study |
title_short | Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study |
title_sort | surveillance of non communicable diseases what matters to users a qualitative interview study |
topic | ncd surveillance diabetes surveillance qualitative interviews information transfer user evaluation |
url | https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFile |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robynkettlitz surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT maikebuchmann surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT oktaytuncer surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT laurakrause surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT thomasziese surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT lukasreitzle surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy |