Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study

Background: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regardi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robyn Kettlitz, Maike Buchmann, Oktay Tuncer, Laura Krause, Thomas Ziese, Lukas Reitzle
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Robert Koch Institute 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Health Monitoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592284635365376
author Robyn Kettlitz
Maike Buchmann
Oktay Tuncer
Laura Krause
Thomas Ziese
Lukas Reitzle
author_facet Robyn Kettlitz
Maike Buchmann
Oktay Tuncer
Laura Krause
Thomas Ziese
Lukas Reitzle
author_sort Robyn Kettlitz
collection DOAJ
description Background: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regarding the dissemination of results of surveillance for non-communicable diseases (NCD) was carried out. Methods: 13 semi-structured guided interviews were conducted with persons from health politics, healthcare, media and science and analysed in a qualitative content analysis (interview survey period: 10/2022 – 01/2023). Results: For all respondents, the frequency of diseases and their determinants, care and consequences were the focus of NCD surveillance. Wider determinants of health and illness situation were also considered relevant. Requirements regarding the presentation of these contents differed between the user groups. Factors that facilitate and inhibit the use of NCD surveillance information were consistent across the user groups. Conclusions: There is a need for the presentation of options for action, especially for users involved in health politics and healthcare. Diabetes surveillance showed that many requirements are already met by the existing formats. Many of the users also wanted the content to be expanded to include other NCD.
format Article
id doaj-art-57b81928dd32451fae7cf31707c95f7c
institution Kabale University
issn 2511-2708
language deu
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Robert Koch Institute
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Monitoring
spelling doaj-art-57b81928dd32451fae7cf31707c95f7c2025-01-21T11:52:57ZdeuRobert Koch InstituteJournal of Health Monitoring2511-27082024-12-019411110.25646/12919johm-9-4-06-e12919Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview studyRobyn Kettlitz0Maike Buchmann1Oktay Tuncer2Laura Krause3Thomas Ziese4Lukas Reitzle5Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Epidemiology, Braunschweig, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany Robert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, GermanyBackground: Surveillance systems for diseases serve as an early warning system and orientation for decision-makers. As part of the National Diabetes Surveillance at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), existing formats of information transfer were evaluated and an analysis of users’ requirements regarding the dissemination of results of surveillance for non-communicable diseases (NCD) was carried out. Methods: 13 semi-structured guided interviews were conducted with persons from health politics, healthcare, media and science and analysed in a qualitative content analysis (interview survey period: 10/2022 – 01/2023). Results: For all respondents, the frequency of diseases and their determinants, care and consequences were the focus of NCD surveillance. Wider determinants of health and illness situation were also considered relevant. Requirements regarding the presentation of these contents differed between the user groups. Factors that facilitate and inhibit the use of NCD surveillance information were consistent across the user groups. Conclusions: There is a need for the presentation of options for action, especially for users involved in health politics and healthcare. Diabetes surveillance showed that many requirements are already met by the existing formats. Many of the users also wanted the content to be expanded to include other NCD.https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFilencd surveillancediabetes surveillancequalitative interviewsinformation transferuser evaluation
spellingShingle Robyn Kettlitz
Maike Buchmann
Oktay Tuncer
Laura Krause
Thomas Ziese
Lukas Reitzle
Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
Journal of Health Monitoring
ncd surveillance
diabetes surveillance
qualitative interviews
information transfer
user evaluation
title Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
title_full Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
title_short Surveillance of non-communicable diseases: What matters to users? A qualitative interview study
title_sort surveillance of non communicable diseases what matters to users a qualitative interview study
topic ncd surveillance
diabetes surveillance
qualitative interviews
information transfer
user evaluation
url https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Reporting/GBEDownloadsJ/Focus_en/JHealthMonit_2024_04_NCD_Interview.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
work_keys_str_mv AT robynkettlitz surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT maikebuchmann surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT oktaytuncer surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT laurakrause surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT thomasziese surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT lukasreitzle surveillanceofnoncommunicablediseaseswhatmatterstousersaqualitativeinterviewstudy