Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionEffective use of the partograph is crucial in identifying abnormal labor (prolonged and obstructed labor) and taking appropriate actions. However, in Ethiopia, the prevalence of obstructed labor is much higher at 11.8% and contributes to 14.4% of the total maternal deaths due to underuti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mulat Ayele, Eyob Shitie Lake, Gizachew Yilak, Getinet Kumie, Biruk Beletew Abate, Alemu Birara Zemariam, Befkad Derese Tilahun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Global Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1339685/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584993149288448
author Mulat Ayele
Eyob Shitie Lake
Gizachew Yilak
Getinet Kumie
Biruk Beletew Abate
Alemu Birara Zemariam
Befkad Derese Tilahun
author_facet Mulat Ayele
Eyob Shitie Lake
Gizachew Yilak
Getinet Kumie
Biruk Beletew Abate
Alemu Birara Zemariam
Befkad Derese Tilahun
author_sort Mulat Ayele
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionEffective use of the partograph is crucial in identifying abnormal labor (prolonged and obstructed labor) and taking appropriate actions. However, in Ethiopia, the prevalence of obstructed labor is much higher at 11.8% and contributes to 14.4% of the total maternal deaths due to underutilization of the partograph by obstetric caregivers. Although a previous systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) had been conducted, they were not representative on a national level as they included a limited number of studies and did not evaluate the current prevalence of partograph utilization beyond July 2019. Since then, there have been inconsistent studies assessing the proportion of partograph utilization and its associated factors. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of partograph utilization and its associated factors in Ethiopia.MethodComprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and HINARI from 1 September 2013 to 23 October 2023. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence and adjusted odds ratio. Stata (version 11.0) was used to analyze the data. Cochrane I2 statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among studies. A subgroup analysis was done based on the study region to minimize underlying heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Eggers test were conducted to assess publication bias.ResultOverall, 661 articles were retrieved, and finally, 23 studies were included in this systematic review, including 7,649 participants. The pooled prevalence of partograph utilization was 54.92% (95% CI: 43.38–66.45). The subgroup analysis showed that partograph utilization was highest in the Dire Dawa region and lowest in the Amhara region. Factors such as partograph training [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.57–5.25], good knowledge about partograph (AOR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.62–4.26), a favorable attitude toward partograph (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.35–2.82), partograph availability (AOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 2.24–6.61), and being in the midwifery profession (AOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 1.78–5.25) were significantly associated with partograph utilization.ConclusionThe pooled prevalence of partograph utilization in Ethiopia was low. Partograph training, good knowledge about partograph, favorable attitude toward partograph, partograph availability in the health facility, and being in the midwifery profession were significantly associated with partograph utilization.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42023475818).
format Article
id doaj-art-569f929cd830443a9d47b4ec8e372eb6
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-5059
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Global Women's Health
spelling doaj-art-569f929cd830443a9d47b4ec8e372eb62025-01-27T06:40:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Global Women's Health2673-50592025-01-01610.3389/fgwh.2025.13396851339685Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisMulat Ayele0Eyob Shitie Lake1Gizachew Yilak2Getinet Kumie3Biruk Beletew Abate4Alemu Birara Zemariam5Befkad Derese Tilahun6Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, EthiopiaIntroductionEffective use of the partograph is crucial in identifying abnormal labor (prolonged and obstructed labor) and taking appropriate actions. However, in Ethiopia, the prevalence of obstructed labor is much higher at 11.8% and contributes to 14.4% of the total maternal deaths due to underutilization of the partograph by obstetric caregivers. Although a previous systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) had been conducted, they were not representative on a national level as they included a limited number of studies and did not evaluate the current prevalence of partograph utilization beyond July 2019. Since then, there have been inconsistent studies assessing the proportion of partograph utilization and its associated factors. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of partograph utilization and its associated factors in Ethiopia.MethodComprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and HINARI from 1 September 2013 to 23 October 2023. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence and adjusted odds ratio. Stata (version 11.0) was used to analyze the data. Cochrane I2 statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among studies. A subgroup analysis was done based on the study region to minimize underlying heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Eggers test were conducted to assess publication bias.ResultOverall, 661 articles were retrieved, and finally, 23 studies were included in this systematic review, including 7,649 participants. The pooled prevalence of partograph utilization was 54.92% (95% CI: 43.38–66.45). The subgroup analysis showed that partograph utilization was highest in the Dire Dawa region and lowest in the Amhara region. Factors such as partograph training [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.57–5.25], good knowledge about partograph (AOR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.62–4.26), a favorable attitude toward partograph (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.35–2.82), partograph availability (AOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 2.24–6.61), and being in the midwifery profession (AOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 1.78–5.25) were significantly associated with partograph utilization.ConclusionThe pooled prevalence of partograph utilization in Ethiopia was low. Partograph training, good knowledge about partograph, favorable attitude toward partograph, partograph availability in the health facility, and being in the midwifery profession were significantly associated with partograph utilization.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42023475818).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1339685/fullpartographpartograph utilizationsystematic reviewsystematic review and meta-analysisEthiopia
spellingShingle Mulat Ayele
Eyob Shitie Lake
Gizachew Yilak
Getinet Kumie
Biruk Beletew Abate
Alemu Birara Zemariam
Befkad Derese Tilahun
Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Frontiers in Global Women's Health
partograph
partograph utilization
systematic review
systematic review and meta-analysis
Ethiopia
title Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in ethiopia a systematic review and meta analysis
topic partograph
partograph utilization
systematic review
systematic review and meta-analysis
Ethiopia
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1339685/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mulatayele utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eyobshitielake utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gizachewyilak utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT getinetkumie utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT birukbeletewabate utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alemubirarazemariam utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT befkadderesetilahun utilizationofpartographandassociatedfactorsamongobstetriccaregiversinethiopiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis