Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
Background. Successful outcome of endodontic treatment depends on chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, during canal preparation, debris may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the amount of apically ex...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9433225 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554961064427520 |
|---|---|
| author | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Manohar Poojari Shilpa Shetty Aishwarya Kamble |
| author_facet | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Manohar Poojari Shilpa Shetty Aishwarya Kamble |
| author_sort | Komal Nanavati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. Successful outcome of endodontic treatment depends on chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, during canal preparation, debris may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris during the pulpectomy procedure in primary molar teeth using two different rotary files and hand files. Materials and Methods. Distal roots of sixty extracted primary molars were divided into three groups: group A: Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, group B: DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, and group C: hand files. Myers and Montgomery experimental model was used. Preweighed Eppendorf tubes were used to collect apically extruded debris. The tubes were then placed in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The weight of the debris attained was determined. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni test. Results. Hand files produced more apical debris extrusion (P<0.05). Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files produced the least debris (P<0.05). Conclusion. Prime Pedo™ and DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files extruded significantly lower amount of debris apically during pulpectomy as compared to hand files. Rotary files can be considered an alternative to hand files in pediatric endodontics. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-56880c68958042559f632353c7f48059 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-56880c68958042559f632353c7f480592025-02-03T05:50:00ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87362022-01-01202210.1155/2022/9433225Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro StudyKomal Nanavati0Farhin Katge1Manohar Poojari2Shilpa Shetty3Aishwarya Kamble4Department of Pediatric and Preventive DentistryDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive DentistryDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive DentistryDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive DentistryDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive DentistryBackground. Successful outcome of endodontic treatment depends on chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, during canal preparation, debris may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris during the pulpectomy procedure in primary molar teeth using two different rotary files and hand files. Materials and Methods. Distal roots of sixty extracted primary molars were divided into three groups: group A: Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, group B: DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, and group C: hand files. Myers and Montgomery experimental model was used. Preweighed Eppendorf tubes were used to collect apically extruded debris. The tubes were then placed in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The weight of the debris attained was determined. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni test. Results. Hand files produced more apical debris extrusion (P<0.05). Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files produced the least debris (P<0.05). Conclusion. Prime Pedo™ and DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files extruded significantly lower amount of debris apically during pulpectomy as compared to hand files. Rotary files can be considered an alternative to hand files in pediatric endodontics.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9433225 |
| spellingShingle | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Manohar Poojari Shilpa Shetty Aishwarya Kamble Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
| title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during pulpectomy procedure in primary molar teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files an in vitro study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9433225 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT komalnanavati comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringpulpectomyprocedureinprimarymolarteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT farhinkatge comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringpulpectomyprocedureinprimarymolarteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT manoharpoojari comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringpulpectomyprocedureinprimarymolarteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT shilpashetty comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringpulpectomyprocedureinprimarymolarteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT aishwaryakamble comparativeevaluationofapicallyextrudeddebrisduringpulpectomyprocedureinprimarymolarteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy |