Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol.
<h4>Background</h4>Mental health policy and service design is increasingly recognizing the importance of the lived experience voice and its inclusion in all aspects of work. Effective inclusion requires a deeper understanding of how best to support lived experience workforce and communit...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283178 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832540105901867008 |
---|---|
author | Jessica E Opie An Vuong Alexandra Macafee Hanan Khalil Natalie Pearce Erandathie Jayakody Christropher Maylea Jennifer E McIntosh |
author_facet | Jessica E Opie An Vuong Alexandra Macafee Hanan Khalil Natalie Pearce Erandathie Jayakody Christropher Maylea Jennifer E McIntosh |
author_sort | Jessica E Opie |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Background</h4>Mental health policy and service design is increasingly recognizing the importance of the lived experience voice and its inclusion in all aspects of work. Effective inclusion requires a deeper understanding of how best to support lived experience workforce and community members to meaningfully participate in the system.<h4>Objectives</h4>This scoping review aims to identify key features of organizational practice and governance that facilitate the safe inclusion of lived experience in decision-making and practice within mental health sector contexts. Specifically, the review focuses on mental health organizations devoted to lived experience advocacy or peer support or those in which lived experience membership (paid or voluntary) is central to advocacy and peer support operations.<h4>Methods</h4>This review protocol was prepared with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and registered with the Open Science Framework. The review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework and is being conducted by a multidisciplinary team including lived experience research fellows. It will include published and grey literature, including government reports, organizational online documents, and theses. Included studies will be identified through comprehensive searches of five databases: PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), and ProQuest Central. Studies published in English from 2000 onwards will be included. Data extraction will be guided by pre-determined extraction instruments. Results will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews flow chart. Results will be presented in tabular form and narratively synthesized. The planned commencement and completion dates for this review were July 1, 2022 and April 1, 2023.<h4>Discussion</h4>It is anticipated that this scoping review will map the current evidence base underpinning organizational practices in which lived experience workers are involved, specifically in the mental health system. It will also inform future mental health policy and research.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Registration: Open Science Framework (registered: July 26, 2022; registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NB3S5). |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-556cf670b9304903a1daeaed54fbf573 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj-art-556cf670b9304903a1daeaed54fbf5732025-02-05T05:32:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01185e028317810.1371/journal.pone.0283178Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol.Jessica E OpieAn VuongAlexandra MacafeeHanan KhalilNatalie PearceErandathie JayakodyChristropher MayleaJennifer E McIntosh<h4>Background</h4>Mental health policy and service design is increasingly recognizing the importance of the lived experience voice and its inclusion in all aspects of work. Effective inclusion requires a deeper understanding of how best to support lived experience workforce and community members to meaningfully participate in the system.<h4>Objectives</h4>This scoping review aims to identify key features of organizational practice and governance that facilitate the safe inclusion of lived experience in decision-making and practice within mental health sector contexts. Specifically, the review focuses on mental health organizations devoted to lived experience advocacy or peer support or those in which lived experience membership (paid or voluntary) is central to advocacy and peer support operations.<h4>Methods</h4>This review protocol was prepared with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and registered with the Open Science Framework. The review will be guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework and is being conducted by a multidisciplinary team including lived experience research fellows. It will include published and grey literature, including government reports, organizational online documents, and theses. Included studies will be identified through comprehensive searches of five databases: PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), and ProQuest Central. Studies published in English from 2000 onwards will be included. Data extraction will be guided by pre-determined extraction instruments. Results will be presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews flow chart. Results will be presented in tabular form and narratively synthesized. The planned commencement and completion dates for this review were July 1, 2022 and April 1, 2023.<h4>Discussion</h4>It is anticipated that this scoping review will map the current evidence base underpinning organizational practices in which lived experience workers are involved, specifically in the mental health system. It will also inform future mental health policy and research.<h4>Trial registration</h4>Registration: Open Science Framework (registered: July 26, 2022; registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NB3S5).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283178 |
spellingShingle | Jessica E Opie An Vuong Alexandra Macafee Hanan Khalil Natalie Pearce Erandathie Jayakody Christropher Maylea Jennifer E McIntosh Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. PLoS ONE |
title | Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. |
title_full | Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. |
title_fullStr | Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. |
title_full_unstemmed | Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. |
title_short | Practice, governance, and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations, and evidence of efficacy: A scoping review protocol. |
title_sort | practice governance and culture characteristics of lived experience organisations and evidence of efficacy a scoping review protocol |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jessicaeopie practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT anvuong practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT alexandramacafee practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT hanankhalil practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT nataliepearce practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT erandathiejayakody practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT christrophermaylea practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol AT jenniferemcintosh practicegovernanceandculturecharacteristicsoflivedexperienceorganisationsandevidenceofefficacyascopingreviewprotocol |