Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Research has shown that approximately 50% of Dutch older adults have a protein intake < 1.0 g/kg bw/day, and new strategies to improve protein intake have been suggested. Information on protein consumption can be collected via FFQs such as the Protein Screener 55+, but recent outcomes have shown...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joost O. Linschooten, Marije H. Verwijs, Marian A. E. de van der Schueren, Annet J. C. Roodenburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/251
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850087966106451968
author Joost O. Linschooten
Marije H. Verwijs
Marian A. E. de van der Schueren
Annet J. C. Roodenburg
author_facet Joost O. Linschooten
Marije H. Verwijs
Marian A. E. de van der Schueren
Annet J. C. Roodenburg
author_sort Joost O. Linschooten
collection DOAJ
description Research has shown that approximately 50% of Dutch older adults have a protein intake < 1.0 g/kg bw/day, and new strategies to improve protein intake have been suggested. Information on protein consumption can be collected via FFQs such as the Protein Screener 55+, but recent outcomes have shown that older adults may be incapable of estimating their own dietary intake. The aim of this study was to compare the reported intake in the Pro55+ with an estimate of protein intake based on photos taken over a period of 7 days to identify how accurate elderly people are in estimating their habitual protein intake over a period of 4 weeks. Protein intake was assessed in interviews using the food frequency questionnaire Pro55+, calculating the risk of a low protein intake (<1.0 gr/kg bw/day). The participants (n = 9) were asked to take photos of everything they consumed for a period of seven consecutive days and were asked whether they modified their consumption behaviour due to photographing. The reported frequency of consumption of products as categorized in the Pro55+ was compared with the frequency of foods visible in the photos as an indication for actual consumption. A Pro55+ score > 30% indicates a high risk of low protein intake (<1.0 gr/kg bw/day). The average Pro55+ score from the interviews was 44.9%, while the average photovoice-based Pro55+ score based on the observed data was 54.9%. In eight out of nine cases the participants overestimated the frequency of nuts/peanuts consumption as well as dairy products like yoghurt (six out of nine). On the contrary, consumption of eggs was underestimated by six out of nine participants. The Pro55+ is a validated screening tool for the risk of a low protein intake based on the consumption of specific groups of food items that have shown to have the highest predictive value. However, this easy-to-use tool depends on the self-reported intake of these items by older adults. The comparison of the reported intakes with the photos of meals and food products showed that it appeared to be difficult for older adults to give accurate estimates, which may suggest that older adults are also insufficiently aware of necessary modifications to their current behaviour to adhere to dietary guidelines, such as an increased protein intake.
format Article
id doaj-art-5557f42e7a0d4e758e80a04c44cff694
institution DOAJ
issn 2504-3900
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Proceedings
spelling doaj-art-5557f42e7a0d4e758e80a04c44cff6942025-08-20T02:43:06ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002024-02-0191125110.3390/proceedings2023091251Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older AdultsJoost O. Linschooten0Marije H. Verwijs1Marian A. E. de van der Schueren2Annet J. C. Roodenburg3Department of Food & Industry, HAS University of Applied Sciences, 5223 DE Den Bosch, The NetherlandsCenter of Expertise, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Urban Vitality, 1067 SM Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDepartment of Food & Industry, HAS University of Applied Sciences, 5223 DE Den Bosch, The NetherlandsResearch has shown that approximately 50% of Dutch older adults have a protein intake < 1.0 g/kg bw/day, and new strategies to improve protein intake have been suggested. Information on protein consumption can be collected via FFQs such as the Protein Screener 55+, but recent outcomes have shown that older adults may be incapable of estimating their own dietary intake. The aim of this study was to compare the reported intake in the Pro55+ with an estimate of protein intake based on photos taken over a period of 7 days to identify how accurate elderly people are in estimating their habitual protein intake over a period of 4 weeks. Protein intake was assessed in interviews using the food frequency questionnaire Pro55+, calculating the risk of a low protein intake (<1.0 gr/kg bw/day). The participants (n = 9) were asked to take photos of everything they consumed for a period of seven consecutive days and were asked whether they modified their consumption behaviour due to photographing. The reported frequency of consumption of products as categorized in the Pro55+ was compared with the frequency of foods visible in the photos as an indication for actual consumption. A Pro55+ score > 30% indicates a high risk of low protein intake (<1.0 gr/kg bw/day). The average Pro55+ score from the interviews was 44.9%, while the average photovoice-based Pro55+ score based on the observed data was 54.9%. In eight out of nine cases the participants overestimated the frequency of nuts/peanuts consumption as well as dairy products like yoghurt (six out of nine). On the contrary, consumption of eggs was underestimated by six out of nine participants. The Pro55+ is a validated screening tool for the risk of a low protein intake based on the consumption of specific groups of food items that have shown to have the highest predictive value. However, this easy-to-use tool depends on the self-reported intake of these items by older adults. The comparison of the reported intakes with the photos of meals and food products showed that it appeared to be difficult for older adults to give accurate estimates, which may suggest that older adults are also insufficiently aware of necessary modifications to their current behaviour to adhere to dietary guidelines, such as an increased protein intake.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/251older adultsprotein intakedietary assessment methods
spellingShingle Joost O. Linschooten
Marije H. Verwijs
Marian A. E. de van der Schueren
Annet J. C. Roodenburg
Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Proceedings
older adults
protein intake
dietary assessment methods
title Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
title_full Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
title_fullStr Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
title_short Photovoicing versus Protein Food Frequency Questionnaire: Differences and Similarities in Measuring the Protein Intake of Community-Dwelling Older Adults
title_sort photovoicing versus protein food frequency questionnaire differences and similarities in measuring the protein intake of community dwelling older adults
topic older adults
protein intake
dietary assessment methods
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/91/1/251
work_keys_str_mv AT joostolinschooten photovoicingversusproteinfoodfrequencyquestionnairedifferencesandsimilaritiesinmeasuringtheproteinintakeofcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT marijehverwijs photovoicingversusproteinfoodfrequencyquestionnairedifferencesandsimilaritiesinmeasuringtheproteinintakeofcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT marianaedevanderschueren photovoicingversusproteinfoodfrequencyquestionnairedifferencesandsimilaritiesinmeasuringtheproteinintakeofcommunitydwellingolderadults
AT annetjcroodenburg photovoicingversusproteinfoodfrequencyquestionnairedifferencesandsimilaritiesinmeasuringtheproteinintakeofcommunitydwellingolderadults