Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing

Nuclear cardiac imaging is a noninvasive, sensitive method providing information on cardiac structure and physiology. Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) evaluates myocardial perfusion, viability, and function and is widely used in clinical routine. The quality of the tomographic image is a ke...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Lyra, Agapi Ploussi, Maritina Rouchota, Stella Synefia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/963264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555420749660160
author Maria Lyra
Agapi Ploussi
Maritina Rouchota
Stella Synefia
author_facet Maria Lyra
Agapi Ploussi
Maritina Rouchota
Stella Synefia
author_sort Maria Lyra
collection DOAJ
description Nuclear cardiac imaging is a noninvasive, sensitive method providing information on cardiac structure and physiology. Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) evaluates myocardial perfusion, viability, and function and is widely used in clinical routine. The quality of the tomographic image is a key for accurate diagnosis. Image filtering, a mathematical processing, compensates for loss of detail in an image while reducing image noise, and it can improve the image resolution and limit the degradation of the image. SPECT images are then reconstructed, either by filter back projection (FBP) analytical technique or iteratively, by algebraic methods. The aim of this study is to review filters in cardiac 2D, 3D, and 4D SPECT applications and how these affect the image quality mirroring the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT images. Several filters, including the Hanning, Butterworth, and Parzen filters, were evaluated in combination with the two reconstruction methods as well as with a specified MatLab program. Results showed that for both 3D and 4D cardiac SPECT the Butterworth filter, for different critical frequencies and orders, produced the best results. Between the two reconstruction methods, the iterative one might be more appropriate for cardiac SPECT, since it improves lesion detectability due to the significant improvement of image contrast.
format Article
id doaj-art-54aac99a4ffe46b384283842d50a964d
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-54aac99a4ffe46b384283842d50a964d2025-02-03T05:48:16ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972014-01-01201410.1155/2014/963264963264Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image ProcessingMaria Lyra0Agapi Ploussi1Maritina Rouchota2Stella Synefia31st Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece2nd Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece1st Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece1st Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, University of Athens, 11528 Athens, GreeceNuclear cardiac imaging is a noninvasive, sensitive method providing information on cardiac structure and physiology. Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) evaluates myocardial perfusion, viability, and function and is widely used in clinical routine. The quality of the tomographic image is a key for accurate diagnosis. Image filtering, a mathematical processing, compensates for loss of detail in an image while reducing image noise, and it can improve the image resolution and limit the degradation of the image. SPECT images are then reconstructed, either by filter back projection (FBP) analytical technique or iteratively, by algebraic methods. The aim of this study is to review filters in cardiac 2D, 3D, and 4D SPECT applications and how these affect the image quality mirroring the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT images. Several filters, including the Hanning, Butterworth, and Parzen filters, were evaluated in combination with the two reconstruction methods as well as with a specified MatLab program. Results showed that for both 3D and 4D cardiac SPECT the Butterworth filter, for different critical frequencies and orders, produced the best results. Between the two reconstruction methods, the iterative one might be more appropriate for cardiac SPECT, since it improves lesion detectability due to the significant improvement of image contrast.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/963264
spellingShingle Maria Lyra
Agapi Ploussi
Maritina Rouchota
Stella Synefia
Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
Cardiology Research and Practice
title Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
title_full Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
title_fullStr Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
title_full_unstemmed Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
title_short Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing
title_sort filters in 2d and 3d cardiac spect image processing
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/963264
work_keys_str_mv AT marialyra filtersin2dand3dcardiacspectimageprocessing
AT agapiploussi filtersin2dand3dcardiacspectimageprocessing
AT maritinarouchota filtersin2dand3dcardiacspectimageprocessing
AT stellasynefia filtersin2dand3dcardiacspectimageprocessing