Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks
Existing classical optical network infrastructure cannot be immediately used for quantum network applications due to photon loss. The first step toward enabling quantum networks is the integration of quantum repeaters into optical networks. However, the expenses and intrinsic noise inherent in quant...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2024-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10607917/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832583975511523328 |
---|---|
author | Shahrooz Pouryousef Hassan Shapourian Alireza Shabani Ramana Kompella Don Towsley |
author_facet | Shahrooz Pouryousef Hassan Shapourian Alireza Shabani Ramana Kompella Don Towsley |
author_sort | Shahrooz Pouryousef |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Existing classical optical network infrastructure cannot be immediately used for quantum network applications due to photon loss. The first step toward enabling quantum networks is the integration of quantum repeaters into optical networks. However, the expenses and intrinsic noise inherent in quantum hardware underscore the need for an efficient deployment strategy that optimizes the placement of quantum repeaters and memories. In this article, we present a comprehensive framework for network planning, aiming to efficiently distribute quantum repeaters across existing infrastructure, with the objective of maximizing quantum network utility within an entanglement distribution network. We apply our framework to several cases including a preliminary illustration of a dumbbell network topology and real-world cases of the SURFnet and ESnet. We explore the effect of quantum memory multiplexing within quantum repeaters, as well as the influence of memory coherence time on quantum network utility. We further examine the effects of different fairness assumptions on network planning, uncovering their impacts on real-time network performance. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-547e4ff4b1f049c785e744052109f3b5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2689-1808 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | IEEE |
record_format | Article |
series | IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering |
spelling | doaj-art-547e4ff4b1f049c785e744052109f3b52025-01-28T00:02:28ZengIEEEIEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering2689-18082024-01-01511610.1109/TQE.2024.343239010607917Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum NetworksShahrooz Pouryousef0https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7542-6900Hassan Shapourian1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-2413Alireza Shabani2Ramana Kompella3Don Towsley4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7808-7375University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USACisco Research, San Jose, CA, USACisco Research, San Jose, CA, USACisco Research, San Jose, CA, USAUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USAExisting classical optical network infrastructure cannot be immediately used for quantum network applications due to photon loss. The first step toward enabling quantum networks is the integration of quantum repeaters into optical networks. However, the expenses and intrinsic noise inherent in quantum hardware underscore the need for an efficient deployment strategy that optimizes the placement of quantum repeaters and memories. In this article, we present a comprehensive framework for network planning, aiming to efficiently distribute quantum repeaters across existing infrastructure, with the objective of maximizing quantum network utility within an entanglement distribution network. We apply our framework to several cases including a preliminary illustration of a dumbbell network topology and real-world cases of the SURFnet and ESnet. We explore the effect of quantum memory multiplexing within quantum repeaters, as well as the influence of memory coherence time on quantum network utility. We further examine the effects of different fairness assumptions on network planning, uncovering their impacts on real-time network performance.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10607917/Network planningquantum networksrepeater placement |
spellingShingle | Shahrooz Pouryousef Hassan Shapourian Alireza Shabani Ramana Kompella Don Towsley Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering Network planning quantum networks repeater placement |
title | Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks |
title_full | Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks |
title_fullStr | Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks |
title_short | Resource Placement for Rate and Fidelity Maximization in Quantum Networks |
title_sort | resource placement for rate and fidelity maximization in quantum networks |
topic | Network planning quantum networks repeater placement |
url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10607917/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahroozpouryousef resourceplacementforrateandfidelitymaximizationinquantumnetworks AT hassanshapourian resourceplacementforrateandfidelitymaximizationinquantumnetworks AT alirezashabani resourceplacementforrateandfidelitymaximizationinquantumnetworks AT ramanakompella resourceplacementforrateandfidelitymaximizationinquantumnetworks AT dontowsley resourceplacementforrateandfidelitymaximizationinquantumnetworks |