A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents

A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla, Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568357115658240
author Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo
Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla
Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González
author_facet Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo
Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla
Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González
author_sort Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo
collection DOAJ
description A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) was found.
format Article
id doaj-art-54627847f5fe4ae7b0e69bc530c50865
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-54627847f5fe4ae7b0e69bc530c508652025-02-03T00:59:12ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/99989249998924A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of AdsorbentsJavier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo0Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla1Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González2Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, km 7 vía al Aeropuerto, AA 127, Manizales, ColombiaA systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) was found.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924
spellingShingle Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo
Javier Ignacio Carrero-Mantilla
Nancy Rocío Sanabria-González
A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
The Scientific World Journal
title A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_full A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_fullStr A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_short A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_sort review of caffeine adsorption studies onto various types of adsorbents
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924
work_keys_str_mv AT javierandresquinterojaramillo areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT javierignaciocarreromantilla areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT nancyrociosanabriagonzalez areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT javierandresquinterojaramillo reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT javierignaciocarreromantilla reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT nancyrociosanabriagonzalez reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents