Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator

Criminal fines in the case of issuance of tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions (TBTS) aim to recover losses of state revenue, but in the event that there is more than one perpetrator, the fines applied cannot be applied equally to each perpetrator because the fines applied become m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anggiat Sautma, Sigid Suseno suseno, Amelia Cahyadini cahyadini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong 2025-01-01
Series:Justisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.um-sorong.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/3849
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544055307796480
author Anggiat Sautma
Sigid Suseno suseno
Amelia Cahyadini cahyadini
author_facet Anggiat Sautma
Sigid Suseno suseno
Amelia Cahyadini cahyadini
author_sort Anggiat Sautma
collection DOAJ
description Criminal fines in the case of issuance of tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions (TBTS) aim to recover losses of state revenue, but in the event that there is more than one perpetrator, the fines applied cannot be applied equally to each perpetrator because the fines applied become multiple. This writing is prepared to analyze the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices involving more than one perpetrator in the perspective of legal objectives. The research method used is normative legal research with a case study approach and a conceptual approach using the reference of Development Law Theory. This research is a new contribution to legal development in the application of criminal fines in the criminal offense of issuing TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator. This writing concludes that the application of criminal fines in the case of issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is carried out proportionally and objectively according to the benefits or benefits obtained by each perpetrator in order to fulfill the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The absence of rules regarding the mechanism for the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is an obstacle to efforts to apply criminal fines as a recovery for losses of state revenue.
format Article
id doaj-art-53220feda3e54d569cf02c608f71712d
institution Kabale University
issn 1979-7532
2686-0821
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher LPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
record_format Article
series Justisi
spelling doaj-art-53220feda3e54d569cf02c608f71712d2025-02-03T11:02:16ZengLPPM Universitas Muhammadiyah SorongJustisi1979-75322686-08212025-01-0111128129810.33506/js.v11i1.38494138Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One PerpetratorAnggiat Sautma0Sigid Suseno suseno1Amelia Cahyadini cahyadini2Padjadjaran UniversityPadjadjaran UniversityPadjadjaran UniversityCriminal fines in the case of issuance of tax invoices that are not based on actual transactions (TBTS) aim to recover losses of state revenue, but in the event that there is more than one perpetrator, the fines applied cannot be applied equally to each perpetrator because the fines applied become multiple. This writing is prepared to analyze the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices involving more than one perpetrator in the perspective of legal objectives. The research method used is normative legal research with a case study approach and a conceptual approach using the reference of Development Law Theory. This research is a new contribution to legal development in the application of criminal fines in the criminal offense of issuing TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator. This writing concludes that the application of criminal fines in the case of issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is carried out proportionally and objectively according to the benefits or benefits obtained by each perpetrator in order to fulfill the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The absence of rules regarding the mechanism for the application of criminal fines for the issuance of TBTS tax invoices with more than one perpetrator is an obstacle to efforts to apply criminal fines as a recovery for losses of state revenue.https://ejournal.um-sorong.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/3849finestbts tax invoicejusticelegal certaintybenefit
spellingShingle Anggiat Sautma
Sigid Suseno suseno
Amelia Cahyadini cahyadini
Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
Justisi
fines
tbts tax invoice
justice
legal certainty
benefit
title Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
title_full Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
title_fullStr Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
title_full_unstemmed Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
title_short Criminal Fines Issuing Tax Invoices Not Based on Actual Transactions with More than One Perpetrator
title_sort criminal fines issuing tax invoices not based on actual transactions with more than one perpetrator
topic fines
tbts tax invoice
justice
legal certainty
benefit
url https://ejournal.um-sorong.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/3849
work_keys_str_mv AT anggiatsautma criminalfinesissuingtaxinvoicesnotbasedonactualtransactionswithmorethanoneperpetrator
AT sigidsusenosuseno criminalfinesissuingtaxinvoicesnotbasedonactualtransactionswithmorethanoneperpetrator
AT ameliacahyadinicahyadini criminalfinesissuingtaxinvoicesnotbasedonactualtransactionswithmorethanoneperpetrator